US Special Forces Attacked CIA Server Farm In Germany In Server Seizure Operation, 5 Soldiers Killed

[CHenry]

to which aspect of this process are you referring?

Imma go out on a limb here and say
All of it

 

[CHenry]

The Kraken failed again last night. This time in Wisconsin. The judge makes some interesting points about the filing that definitely make you wonder what the plaintiffs were thinking.

At one point, the judge points out the filing quotes from another case (Swaffer) in support of the plaintiff's position. Only that quote doesn't exist and the case it pointed to didn't deal with electors at all.

"And the plaintiff seems to have made up the “quote” in his brief that purports to be from Swaffer"... "The court has read page 4 of Swaffer—a decision by this court’s colleague, Judge J.P. Stadtmueller—three times and cannot find these words."

And in another section regarding the request to stop the counting and prohibit certification... 'The plaintiff asks the court to prohibit from occurring an event that has already occurred. An event that happened the day before he filed this lawsuit and nine days before the court issues this order.'

But perhaps the most crazy thing was when Powell told the court it wanted to keep the name of it's star witness secret, even from the defense. But, in filing their PDF, they failed to fully redact the person's name...

Whats this got to do with Kraken?

 

[TedKennedy]

Whats this got to do with Kraken?

Look up the definition of Kraken. That really says all you need to know.

"Throughout the centuries, the kraken has been a staple of sailors' superstitions and mythos."

Basically an imaginary entity that has great power and is to be feared, emphasis on imaginary.

 

[donner]

Awesome info capt' obviouse lol

you're welcome.

 

[ignerntbend]

Only in the old fashioned English sense of the word.

 

[donner]

Whats this got to do with Kraken?

Quotes from the dismissal of Powell's Kraken lawsuit for the fourth time? Or the legal team's inability to protect it's own witness while asking a judge to keep the person's identity a secret from the defense?

 

[donner]

Yeah, that sounds like clown show level stuff. WTF is going on?

I don't understand how more people wouldn't be mad at 'clown show level' stuff (as you said). If the argument is that the fraud is so widespread, obvious and dangerous then why would people be okay with these sloppy attempts to prove it that are not only failing, but failing in embarrassing ways?

 

[donner]

Imma go out on a limb here and say
All of it

I wont speak for him, but if he does mean all of it then i think there are some better simile out there for it. But YMMV, of course.

 

[MaddSkillz]

I don't understand how more people wouldn't be mad at 'clown show level' stuff (as you said). If the argument is that the fraud is so widespread, obvious and dangerous then why would people be okay with these sloppy attempts to prove it that are not only failing, but failing in embarrassing ways?

Failing, how?

 

[donner]

Failing, how?

Well, as i wrote it there i meant in court. That each presentation has, as of yet, failed to convince any judge at any level. And that the filings themselves have been riddled with errors (like quoting things that do not exist, asking for things that cannot be granted, etc).

Perhaps the cases will go higher and convince the SCOTUS. Perhaps not.

But as an example, the judge in the AZ case said, “Not only have Plaintiffs failed to provide the Court with factual support for their extraordinary claims, but they have wholly failed to establish that they have standing for the Court to consider them."

And

“Allegations that find favor in the public sphere of gossip and innuendo cannot be a substitute for earnest pleadings and procedure in federal court.”