dittome too
Look-up the article in ABAJournal today. She seems to have filed amicus briefs with the Supreme Court while teaching at Harvard, but that wouldn't qualify as practicing law in Mass. unless something else turns up. The woman doesn't have a law office in Mass. Unless somethintg else surfaces. The possibility exists that she's been practicing some sort of clandestined, back alley, black market law, but the evidence hasn't been produced as yet
Read the piece I linked here.
http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/elizabeth-warrens-law-license-problem/
Her office at Cambridge is a proffessorial office. Filing Breifs with the supreme court while having an office at Harvard is not practicing Law in the State of Massachusetts. At least that's what all those lefties are going to successfully claim.
If she had a shingle up at her Harvard office, you can bet she's taken it down by now.
It's all part of the plan.
If she had a shingle up at her Harvard office, you can bet she's taken it down by now.
It's all part of the plan.
Read, the links inside that story. The ones that support "Brown's side of the story." They all take you to the Boston Globe and none of them do any such thing. They relate only to friend of the court briefs in filed in Federal court.
When has she served as counsel in a case in Mass. court? That's what your bloggers need to find out next.
Yep. Got me too.Oh good ... I'm not alone ...
If I lived in MA I wouldn't vote for her because she's ugly.
And here I was thinking she built all the roads and bridges for us. Who knew?
Can't wait to see how this plays out!
Similar threads
