Right, but the process to change the law is so corrupt that it's effectively controlled by the people who need to be sued. That's why I'm apprehensive of tort reform legislation.
Right, but the process to change the law is so corrupt that it's effectively controlled by the people who need to be sued. That's why I'm apprehensive of tort reform legislation.
And would you level the same criticism at a prosecutor who wants a conviction? Or a defense lawyer trying to avoid one?
Or a defense lawyer advocating for a physician accused of malpractice?
This is what we do! Damn, this is our job. We want to win for our clients.
And when it might not in your best interest to win for your client, then what?
I only get paid if I win, so winning is always in my best interest.
Actually it is controlled more by the lawyers then anyone else. If you look you will notice most members of congress are legal beagles, not doctors or anything. This is why real tort reform stands very little chance of getting passed. The deck is stacked against it by those who have the most to lose, the lawyers.
Now back to putting out fires at the political forum.
What if it angered a judge you appear before on a regular basis?
Books, I'm the judge and it angers me that you regularly win.
I'm the judge, you're the athhoe and I'm angry.
How about something more like this;
Mr./Ms. lawyer if you win this case it might bring out information that could bring liability issues to other entities/persons. And it could have a negative effect on the public's faith in the Judicial system.
It might bring out information?
What sort of information? What exactly are you insinuating your honor?
Spit it out.
What sort of information? What exactly are you insinuating your honor?
Spit it out.
In my chambers, and remember your words could lead to being summarily jailed for contempt.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Members who just want arms list, should I be bothered? Classifieds gripe…- Latest: Ready_fire_aim
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-