It's funny to me how many people think health care can't be handled by the free market, yet, the health care system in this country was affordable and simple until the government got involved and it quit being a free market.
I agree with Krugman that healthcare cannot be efficiently allocated by a free market, but I would make the argument that health care is not as important as law enforcement, courts, roads, etc... and should not be allocated.
But that's just me
It's funny to me how many people think health care can't be handled by the free market, yet, the health care system in this country was affordable and simple until the government got involved and it quit being a free market.
You assert that the system was affordable and simple, but I don't think that's true. Do you have any facts/evidence to support it?
With respect to the "state of healthcare in the country" it is neither within the Constitutional realm of the legislature, nor the financial responsibility of the taxpayer, to "improve the situation somehow".
The "solution", is to defund all previous solutions.
Don't hold your breath.
The solution is to get government out of the way. Government is the problem.
Washington has it's own set of morals - whatever goes best at the time.
And that usually follows the money.
People in this country need to realize we have an extremely corrupt form of gov't.
Money rules Washington, just like it rules our judicial system.
You seem to know economics well enough that you should know what I meant by "allocated," meaning how goods/services make their way to consumers through markets or whatever.
Enter your email address to join: