Will the Tulsa County Sheriff sign off on SBR?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Glocktogo

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
29,427
Reaction score
15,663
Location
Collinsville
And the above has exactly WHAT to do with your right to own an SBR?

Nothing, but the CLEO letter requirement is an unfunded initiative by the BATFE and there's no requirement for the sheriff to do it. When you're expecting a neutral or anti-gun politician to sign their name on something authorizing you to have a highly restricted item, most feel they have a right to set conditions on the use of their name where it isn't required that they give it. That's why the Trust route is the only way to go. You can have more than one person on the Trust and you're not subject to an arbitrary approval.
 

Buzzgun

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
1,164
Reaction score
381
Location
sand springs
Nothing, but the CLEO letter requirement is an unfunded initiative by the BATFE and there's no requirement for the sheriff to do it. When you're expecting a neutral or anti-gun politician to sign their name on something authorizing you to have a highly restricted item, most feel they have a right to set conditions on the use of their name where it isn't required that they give it. That's why the Trust route is the only way to go. You can have more than one person on the Trust and you're not subject to an arbitrary approval.


Just to be clear, by signing a form 4, a LEO does not "authorize" anything. He/She is simply signing a statement that says he knows of no reason that the person requesting the transfer can't legally own the item.

Unfortunately, many LEOs seem to think they should control who has these items.

I have heard talk in the NFA community that the LEO signature requirement maybe going away.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom