Yet more insanity, this time in sheriff Joe,s ao

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

shooterdave

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
1,803
Reaction score
3
Location
Coalgate
This argument reminds me of the joke about not all Muslims betting terrorists, but all terrorists being Muslim. Kind of the same... Not all mentally Ill are spree killers, but all spree killers are mentally Ill. While I hate the idea of locking up everyone who is diagnosed as mentally unstable, it's pretty obvious at the current system we are using sucks. The way things are now, even those who are EOD'd only get stabilization treatment and are sent right back into the community. Many times the is a 72 hr. process. At the most it's a 28 day process. We simply don't have the facilities to deal with them. That is why our prison system is so heavy with mentally Ill persons. I've seen the number of offenders that are taking psychotropic meds triple in the past 15 years. Part of that is better healthcare for inmates, but a lot of it is simply more mentally ill offenders. I attribute much of it to chemical imbalances in their brains due to to heavy meth usage. The correlation of bipolar and paranoid-schizophrenic offenders to mental illness is astounding.
 

RickN

Eye Bleach Salesman
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
26,570
Reaction score
37,234
Location
Edmond
What are you prepared do with them? Who gets to diagnose them as violent. Does Obama and the NWO get to diagnose them?
Maybe the U.N. should diagnose them.

No their doctor should and as with everything else DOHbama, the UN and all other screwball groups should stay out of it. I forget where I say the stat, but the states without a law that lets them force those diagnosed as a threat to themselves or others into treatment have a 1/3 higher murder rate then states those with such a law. The idea behind doing away with such laws is to not violate the persons rights. Personally I think if a person is diagnosed as a threat then there should be a 2nd and third opinion and if 2 out of 3 agree the patient should be institutionalized until no longer a threat to others.

EDIT: I know this is from the hated Foxnews but it is worth reading.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/22/connecticut-killings-reopen-debate-on-mental-illness/
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top Bottom