Glocktogo said:I get that you're a doctor and don't appreciate being questioned on things within your domain
Glocktogo said:Face it, your industry has credibility issues and rightly so.
Hahaha
Last edited by a moderator:
Glocktogo said:I get that you're a doctor and don't appreciate being questioned on things within your domain
Glocktogo said:Face it, your industry has credibility issues and rightly so.
You do need to read it again. Nobody in his Ped's visit asked him about gun ownership, but you're convinced they're asking him if he owns guns on forms that he fills out. Neither is the case. Start over, you get a mulligan here.
Is the OP's pediatrician a member of the AAP? How would you know? You're assuming an awful lot here.
Which other causes of death by unintentional injury are off the table for a pediatrician to try to talk to a parent about?
See where I wrote "in the house"??? Can you see it now? Also, I didn't say "forms he fills out", I said "they asked". Is English your first language? You're parsing my posts incorrectly, which is why I ask. Either way, it really doesn't matter at all. When the California gun cops come calling, they don't say they're there for any guns you "own", they say they're there for "any guns in the home". They could care less who "owns" them and you know that. Don't play dumb, it's unbecoming.9 month olds check-up; asked if guns are in the house
Hahaha
No, YOU didn't read what I posted directly above. READ IT AGAIN. Here, let me help you: See where I wrote "in the house"??? Can you see it now? Also, I didn't say "forms he fills out", I said "they asked". Is English your first language? You're parsing my posts incorrectly, which is why I ask. Either way, it really doesn't matter at all. When the California gun cops come calling, they don't say they're there for any guns you "own", they say they're there for "any guns in the home". They could care less who "owns" them and you know that. Don't play dumb, it's unbecoming.
As for the membership status of the OP's Dr., irrelevant. The doc doesn't create the survey, they just use what they're given. How many independent family docs can you name? Now how many work for "medical groups" that just go with the flow? Now, how many of those reports created by anti-gun medical associations are reported back to said groups for "statistical purposes"? Yes I'm assuming on this point, but it's a pretty safe assumption.
Categorizing you as a gun owner on a medical record, doesn't.
Bottom line. All the rest is BS.
Example:
Do you grow a garden? if so, what chemicals do you use? I see those chemicals MIGHT have caused cancer in California. You are guilty of child abuse if you feed those veggi's to your kids.
When does the stupidity end?
[R]esults of a large national
randomized controlled trial demon-
strated that brief physician counsel-
ing directed at parents, combined
with distribution of gunlocks, may be
effective in promoting safer storage of
guns in homes with children.
52
A recent randomized controlled trial
found that a safe storage campaign
with gun safe distribution was both
feasible and effective at limiting
household exposure to unlocked and
loaded guns.
53
Enter your email address to join: