1950 to 2010: Not One Mass Public Shooting Where Citizens Could Be Armed

[RugersGR8]

Gun-free zones save lives, Benghazi was caused by a video, Obamacare will save families $2,500 a year, etc. If you believe these lib dem Bravo Sierra claims, then you will also believe that taking away our 2nd Amendment Rights, taking away self defense weapons away from law abiding citizens, etc. will thus make us safer---and you are a lib dem Kool-Aid drinking, low-info, sheeple voting jackwagon.



http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ublic-shooting-where-citizens-could-be-armed/
1950 to 2010: Not One Mass Public Shooting Where Citizens Could Be Armed
by AWR Hawkins 7 Sep 2016

In other words, gun-free zones or gun-restricted zones were the targets of choice.

 

[tRidiot]

That gets me an error, and I don't see it on the site...

 

[dennishoddy]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ublic-shooting-where-citizens-could-be-armed/

 

[RugersGR8]

That gets me an error, and I don't see it on the site...

Thanks, I fixed it and I think that dennishoddy beat me to it and also posted the correct link.

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

Gun-free zones save lives, Benghazi was caused by a video, Obamacare will save families $2,500 a year, etc. If you believe these lib dem Bravo Sierra claims, then you will also believe that taking away our 2nd Amendment Rights, taking away self defense weapons away from law abiding citizens, etc. will intern make us safer---and you are a lib dem Kool-Aid drinking, low-info, sheeple voting jackwagon.



http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ublic-shooting-where-citizens-could-be-armed/
1950 to 2010: Not One Mass Public Shooting Where Citizens Could Be Armed
by AWR Hawkins 7 Sep 2016

In other words, gun-free zones or gun-restricted zones were the targets of choice.

All who made those quotes from your first paragraph are well versed in the Sphinctorial Arts.

Woody

 

[_CY_]

Gun-free zones save lives, Benghazi was caused by a video, Obamacare will save families $2,500 a year, etc. If you believe these lib dem Bravo Sierra claims, then you will also believe that taking away our 2nd Amendment Rights, taking away self defense weapons away from law abiding citizens, etc. will thus make us safer---and you are a lib dem Kool-Aid drinking, low-info, sheeple voting jackwagon.



http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ublic-shooting-where-citizens-could-be-armed/
1950 to 2010: Not One Mass Public Shooting Where Citizens Could Be Armed
by AWR Hawkins 7 Sep 2016

In other words, gun-free zones or gun-restricted zones were the targets of choice.

contrary to popular belief .. most if not almost all radical muslim terrorist are NOT stupid in the least .. some are highly educated.

why wouldn't they pick target rich zones with rules in place to prevent everyone from being armed?

 

[Rooster1971]

contrary to popular belief .. most if not almost all radical muslim terrorist are NOT stupid in the least .. some are highly educated.

why wouldn't they pick target rich zones with rules in place to prevent everyone from being armed?

Most of the mass shootings in the US haven't been radical Muslims. Not giving those vermin a pass, but facts are facts.