Cue...I read it and still can't come up with any way to imagine a short-term price increase in ammo leading to many families supporting a gun ban.
Cue...I read it and still can't come up with any way to imagine a short-term price increase in ammo leading to many families supporting a gun ban.
If I didn't know any better, I'd think that half the folks on this board are socialists.
Whether someone has a legitimate, immediate use for an item or not, there is no such thing as artificial demand. Demand is demand. People keep comparing guns to gold, but saying it's different with gold because guns have artificial demand. "Gold has real value." When someone will explain to me why $2000 spent on gold is more useful than $2000 spent on guns, then I will succumb to the idea of artificial demand.
Cue...I read it and still can't come up with any way to imagine a short-term price increase in ammo leading to many families supporting a gun ban.
Would you still post on OSA if there was a membership fee?
How about this?
not fighting a ban = supporting a ban.
People that lose interest in guns are less likely to fight for them.
Obviously, but nice evade.
Hmmmmmmm
Enter your email address to join: