A few words from Charles.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

3inSlugger

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
2,879
Reaction score
72
Location
Yukon
Are we really arguing over whether the State should pay for contraceptives?
Are we really arguing over whether the State should pay for a pill that allows people to have a voluntary pleasurable activity with 96% less risk of having a child?
Again a VOLUNTARY activity and a non-necessary drug.

This should be a non-issue really. The fact that mainstream Republicans are even addressing this issue with anything but incredulity is telling of the state of "conservatism".
 

caojyn

Sharpshooter
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
8,186
Reaction score
1,496
Location
Edmond
You do know that lots of plans pay for Viagra, right?

What's the diff?
not that i agree with this but according to insurance companies not being able to *cough* stand at attention *cough* is a medical condition. Being a naturally fertile woman is not.
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
21,947
Reaction score
10,281
Location
Tornado Alley
Are we really arguing over whether the State should pay for contraceptives?
Are we really arguing over whether the State should pay for a pill that allows people to have a voluntary pleasurable activity with 96% less risk of having a child?
Again a VOLUNTARY activity and a non-necessary drug.

This should be a non-issue really. The fact that mainstream Republicans are even addressing this issue with anything but incredulity is telling of the state of "conservatism".

It's not only BCPs. The dims seem to think that the morning after pill is required also. You know, very early term abortion is a health issue. :rolleyes:
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom