Anwar al-Awlaki Killed In Yemen Air Strike

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
21,699
Reaction score
13,485
Location
Under your bed
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65035.html

Obama impeachment a possibility, says Ron Paul


948

Email
Print

Ron Paul (left) and Barack Obama are shown in this composite. | AP Photos
Ron Paul said President Obama's decision was a 'step in the wrong direction.' | AP Photos Close
By DAN HIRSCHHORN | 10/3/11 3:52 PM EDT

Ron Paul said Monday that President Barack Obama’s targeted killing of Anwar al-Awlaki might be an impeachable offense.

Asked at a Manchester, N.H. town hall meeting about last week’s killing of the American-born Al Qaeda leader, the Texas congressman said impeachment would be “possible,” but that he wants to know more about how the administration “flouted the law.”


Paul called the killing a movement toward “tyranny.”

“I put responsibility on the president because this is obviously a step in the wrong direction,” Paul said. “We have just totally disrespected the Constitution.”

The comments once again put Paul at odds with his Republican rivals over foreign policy and the war on terror in the latest indication of how his foreign policy views stray far from Republican orthodoxy even in a GOP that’s taken on an increasingly isolationist bent. Candidates like Michele Bachmann and Mitt Romney — who included the president in a list of people he commended in a statement released Friday — have generally been supportive of the killing. No one else in the field has spoken out against it.

But Paul’s stuck with the civil libertarians who’ve criticized the targeted killing of an American citizen without public due process.

Paul, speaking at the University of New Hampshire’s Manchester campus as part of a brief swing through the state, also made another pitch for eliminating the federal income tax.

“If our lives and our liberty are our own, we ought to be able to keep the fruits of our labor,” he said.

But he modulated a bit when asked about eliminating social welfare programs, offering a caution that he said “might be a bit too pragmatic for some.”

“I have an ideal of what we should strive for and a goal, and that would be no social services,” he said. “But for me it’s trying to work our way out of this. … I don’t argue we should drop those cold. I don’t even believe in closing down the Federal Reserve in one day.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65035.html#ixzz1Zq1w3ujG
 

vvvvvvv

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
12,284
Reaction score
65
Location
Nowhere
Who says they knew anything about it?
Libya comes to mind.

Libya's different. Libya was aiding terrorists posing a threat to a foreign country, not attacking terrorists who the President has determined may pose a threat to the United States.

Ron Paul et al voted to give the President the broad authority to decide who is and isn't a terrorist that poses a threat to the United States and deal with them as he sees fit.
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
21,699
Reaction score
13,485
Location
Under your bed
Libya's different. Libya was aiding terrorists posing a threat to a foreign country, not attacking terrorists who the President has determined may pose a threat to the United States.
My point was the POTUS sent our troops to Libya without consulting Congress which is a NO-NO... Maybe he didn't consult congress about the drone hit...I would bet not.
 

vvvvvvv

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
12,284
Reaction score
65
Location
Nowhere
My point was the POTUS sent our troops to Libya without consulting Congress which is a NO-NO... Maybe he didn't consult congress about the drone hit...I would bet not.

Congress gave the President the perpetual authority to act without further consent on individuals which he determines to be a threat. He did not legally need to consult with Congress about the drone hit.

It's funny that Ron Paul is calling for impeachment over something that he voted to allow.
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
21,699
Reaction score
13,485
Location
Under your bed
Congress gave the President the perpetual authority to act without further consent on individuals which he determines to be a threat. He did not legally need to consult with Congress about the drone hit.

It's funny that Ron Paul is calling for impeachment over something that he voted to allow.

This is what makes me question your first statement here.
 

vvvvvvv

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
12,284
Reaction score
65
Location
Nowhere
This is what makes me question your first statement here.

What's to question? Ultimately, Congress, and specifically those who voted for SJR 23 of the 107th Congress, are responsible. And that includes Ron Paul.

Words don't mean a thing in politics; votes mean everything.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom