ATF proposal to “re-define” what components constitute a firearm

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
4,240
Reaction score
8,147
Location
Tulsa Oklahoma
From what I can tell, proposal is to make any receiver (including Possibly uppers) a firearm.
Lots of ambiguous language.
https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/definition-frame-or-receiver

https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/definition-frame-or-receiver/summary


I haven’t finished reading the entire proposal but it looks like it would reclassify new uppers as firearms

Similar discussion here. https://www.okshooters.com/threads/...nts-constitute-a-firearm.313165/#post-3572841

Didn’t see the other discussion thanks

The ATF needs to be told they are not law makers.

They can call 'em "rules" all they want, but if breaking a "rule" sends you to jail, that rule is law.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
2,849
Reaction score
2,418
Location
Tulsa, OK
Once the proposed rule has been published in the Federal Register we have 90 days to comment on them. We did stop their planned pistol brace rule change last fall by flooding them with negative comments. We need to do that again.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom