The ruling ignored certain aspects of the case, and pretty much stood on the foundation of In light of our nations extensive practice of restricting citizens freedom to carry firearms in a concealed manner, we hold that this activity does not fall within the scope of the Second Amendments protections. It's also in direct conflict with the 7th Circuit's ruling in Heller v. McDonald.
If the courts have already ruled that the 2nd is an individual right, then it's automatically a right reserved to the people, not the states. If the right to "keep AND bear" arms is a right, then the only logical way to say it doesn't cover concealed carry is to admit that it DOES cover open carry. That is unless someone can come up with a way to bear arms that is neither open nor concealed.
