BARR: The U.N. comes after America’s guns

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

DA 20

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 15, 2009
Messages
465
Reaction score
49
Location
Bartlesville, OK
Barack Obama’s OK of a gun-control treaty would destroy the Second Amendment
The true scope of the anti-firearm crusade of the United Nations, which began more than a dozen years ago, finally is coming into clear focus, as the White House readies to sign the Arms Trade Treaty adopted with U.S. support this past April by the U.N. General Assembly. The reach of this long-term, carefully crafted agenda is truly breathtaking, going far beyond the publicly articulated goals of even the most radical of homegrown gun-control groups.

Since the first major U.N. meeting in July 2001, officially launching the so-called “Program of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects,” this bureaucratic behemoth on the banks of the East River in New York City has been attempting to stretch its tentacles into the domestic regulation of firearms. If the administration of President Obama signs the Arms Trade Treaty, the U.N. will have taken a major step toward its ultimate goal — regardless of whether the treaty is ever submitted to the Senate for ratification.

According to experts familiar with this process, the mere act of signing the treaty — a responsibility that would fall to Secretary of State John Kerry — would “obligate” the U.S. government as a signatory not to act “contrary to” its terms. Those “terms” are, to quote Ross Perot, the “devil in the detail” — found not only within the four corners of the document itself, but in companion, foundational documents on which it is based.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/19/barr-the-un-comes-after-americas-guns/#ixzz2cbVrHDp7
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

:mad::mad:
 

ripnbst

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
4,831
Reaction score
46
Location
Spring, TX
Has to pass the Senate I believe, just his signature means nothing. Won't happen. Don't worry. Obama can sign it and say he tried knowing that the senate will kill it. He doesn't have to look like the bad guy, we keep our guns. Everybody goes home happy.
 

Gideon

Formerly SirROFL
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
1,736
Reaction score
1,093
Location
Tulsa
I'm not saying that this isn't bad news but I have to laugh at the thought of blue helmets wandering around with unloaded rifles asking people nicely for their guns.

I realize that's not what's happening but that's the cartoonish image I got in my head.
 

vvvvvvv

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
12,284
Reaction score
65
Location
Nowhere
cdn.memegenerator.net_instances_400x_24109148.jpg


I guess it is Wednesday. Isn't that the day when the fearmongering emails go out?
 

0311

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
2,293
Reaction score
2
Location
Hell
Veggie Meat, I have a question; can the President enforce a UN mandate domestically? I realize this will be incremental, but could the President activate the National Guard to enforce a UN mandate? I keep reading on this these threads where the Senate has to ratify. I simply don't know much about these things.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom