Bill would require all Oklahoma voters to re-register, show birth certificate

[sherrick13]

Can't do it, or it would have already been done.

What the well-meaning election fraud crowd is unwilling to admit is that we actually have such a retarded voting population that yes - the United States voters elected Joe Biden.

It is painful, and it is the result of decades of propaganda, letting anyone vote, trying to be "nice" and "inclusive".

But that is where we are.

81,000,000 votes.

Obama got 65 million in 2012

Hillary got 65 million in 2016


You really expect us to believe the potato
legally got 81 mil?


I do agree a large portion of the electorate is ignorant.

Which is exactly why voting from your couch shouldn't be allowed. My point EXACTLY.

 

[Rez Exelon]

No deflection at all.

Do you really think we dont have election security problems in this country?

Really?

Three replies and deflections in and you still haven't backed up a single claim --- you just keep asking questions. You grow tiresome.

 

[donner]

81,000,000 votes.

Obama got 65 million in 2012

Hillary got 65 million in 2016


You really expect us to believe the potato
legally got 81 mil?


I do agree a large portion of the electorate is ignorant.

Which is exactly why voting from your couch shouldn't be allowed. My point EXACTLY.

This is the kind of question that seems to come more from opinion than it does from logic.

like it or not, Trump was a polarizing figure for the left, so it's not exactly surprising there was a bigger push to get people registered.

In terms of election spending, you can see that it was up $8 billion overall from 2016 to 2020 and up ~$3.4 billion for just the presidential race.

Cycle	Total Cost of Election	Congressional Races	Presidential Race
2022	$8,937,407,772	$8,937,407,772	N/A
2020*	$14,403,966,687	$8,703,050,547	$5,700,916,140
2018	$5,725,183,133	$5,725,183,133	N/A
2016*	$6,511,181,587	$4,124,304,874	$2,386,876,712

And according to this chart, the dems spent more for the presidential race.

But strictly speaking, 400K additional voters per state isn't exactly a lot when you look at the relatively low turnout for people of voting age in most places. And yes, it would be high for some states, but we know it wouldn't be an equal distribution, i'm just illustrating how 20 million isn't that high of a number in a country our size. Between 2012 and 2020 how many people turned 18 and how many new voters registered who were of age, but not previously registered? Or how many people didn't vote in previous elections who might have returned to voting in 2020?

And after the 2016 surprise for Hillary, people might have made it a point to show up in 2020 who assumed they didn't need to in 2016. Or perhaps the lack of 3rd party candidates on the left affected the numbers some in 2020, too. Votes that were shifted away in 2016.

And some republican voters from 2016 might have defected. too.

But really, the total number of votes wouldn't tell the entire picture anyway, as more people voting in NY didn't really impact the electoral points in the same way that voters changing their minds from 2016 to 2020 did in places like PA, MI, AZ, GA, etc. Just as the left was surprised that some states flipped for Trump in 2016.

But again, just because you think he is a potato doesn't immediately equal fraud, as you seem to indicate above. Nor am i attempting to say there wasn't any fraud (i have said many times there most certainly was).

 

[turkeyrun]

20 million may be a small number in the overall population, BUT you are a 1/3 increase, 81 vs 65, in support of **** Potato over Hitlery or Odumbo. THAT is significant.

Add in the stolen voting machines, fire, easily hacked, mysterious absentee ballots, closed ballot counts, deceased voters, voters with multiple ballots, ......

Suspicion of fraud warrants an intense, in depth, thorough investigation.

 

[TedKennedy]

20 million may be a small number in the overall population, BUT you are a 1/3 increase, 81 vs 65, in support of **** Potato over Hitlery or Odumbo. THAT is significant.

Add in the stolen voting machines, fire, easily hacked, mysterious absentee ballots, closed ballot counts, deceased voters, voters with multiple ballots, ......

Suspicion of fraud warrants an intense, in depth, thorough investigation.

Dominion?

 

[sherrick13]

This is the kind of question that seems to come more from opinion than it does from logic.

like it or not, Trump was a polarizing figure for the left, so it's not exactly surprising there was a bigger push to get people registered.

In terms of election spending, you can see that it was up $8 billion overall from 2016 to 2020 and up ~$3.4 billion for just the presidential race.



And according to this chart, the dems spent more for the presidential race.
View attachment 449544



But strictly speaking, 400K additional voters per state isn't exactly a lot when you look at the relatively low turnout for people of voting age in most places. And yes, it would be high for some states, but we know it wouldn't be an equal distribution, i'm just illustrating how 20 million isn't that high of a number in a country our size. Between 2012 and 2020 how many people turned 18 and how many new voters registered who were of age, but not previously registered? Or how many people didn't vote in previous elections who might have returned to voting in 2020?

And after the 2016 surprise for Hillary, people might have made it a point to show up in 2020 who assumed they didn't need to in 2016. Or perhaps the lack of 3rd party candidates on the left affected the numbers some in 2020, too. Votes that were shifted away in 2016.

And some republican voters from 2016 might have defected. too.

But really, the total number of votes wouldn't tell the entire picture anyway, as more people voting in NY didn't really impact the electoral points in the same way that voters changing their minds from 2016 to 2020 did in places like PA, MI, AZ, GA, etc. Just as the left was surprised that some states flipped for Trump in 2016.

But again, just because you think he is a potato doesn't immediately equal fraud, as you seem to indicate above.

So you dont think there is material cheating. Got it.

Three replies and deflections in and you still haven't backed up a single claim --- you just keep asking questions. You grow tiresome.

20 million may be a small number in the overall population, BUT you are a 1/3 increase, 81 vs 65, in support of **** Potato over Hitlery or Odumbo. THAT is significant.

Add in the stolen voting machines, fire, easily hacked, mysterious absentee ballots, closed ballot counts, deceased voters, voters with multiple ballots, ......

Suspicion of fraud warrants an intense, in depth, thorough investigation.

Yet, many either choose not to see it or are co-opted by the MSM. Or are just propogandaists themselves.

 

[TedKennedy]

Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox News Network - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There's certainly been some propaganda spread.

 

[donner]

So you dont think there is material cheating. Got it.

Amazingly, that isn’t at all what I said. lol.

I said what you referenced as a sign of cheating discounts multiple factors that can explain (in part or all) of what you said.

What you said isn’t proof of anything unto itself.

 

[donner]

20 million may be a small number in the overall population, BUT you are a 1/3 increase, 81 vs 65, in support of **** Potato over Hitlery or Odumbo. THAT is significant.

Add in the stolen voting machines, fire, easily hacked, mysterious absentee ballots, closed ballot counts, deceased voters, voters with multiple ballots, ......

Suspicion of fraud warrants an intense, in depth, thorough investigation.

If those things are all true it certainly does warrant investigation, and some places have done so (but that is beside the point, I’m sure).

But absent of corroborating evidence, an increase in voter participation alone (which was presented) is not proof of anything.

 

[sherrick13]

If those things are all true it certainly does warrant investigation, and some places have done so (but that is beside the point, I’m sure).

But absent of corroborating evidence, an increase in voter participation alone (which was presented) is not proof of anything.

There was most certainly an increase in ballots. Thats fo sho.