Um, NO.The difference to me is that one scenario is a private individual(s) exposing a private organization on their willingness to aide and abet a criminal enterprise.
The other is a municipal government actually violating or attempting to violate a federal law while attempting to induce a federally regulated private individual or business in another state in which they have no statutory authority to commit a federal offense.
See the difference?
They were both attempting to videotape illegal, or possibly illegal activity.
If either one broke a law in doing so they should be held accountable. Private, Municipal, State, or Federal.
I think that was shadow's point, and I agree with him.
We are a nation of laws. They apply to everyone. Or they are supposed to.