The law will make the have first hand knowledge. While I still do not agree with them making entry at all it is more strict than the current law where they just have to believe the person is there.
New law: they saw you go in the house or see you in the house
Old law: some Joe Blow told them you were there yesterday and usually stay there everyday.
It doesnt sound like it but this IS a (small) step in the right direction. Under existing statute they only have to reasonable suspicion. Now they have to have first hand eyes on beyond a readonable doubt. And they have to announce and demand surrender BEFORE forcing entry.
In my opinion if they know the dude is in the house they should have to wait for him to exit or call leo's if there is an actual warrant and not just a "bond surrender". But they at least tightened tge reigns on an unregulated industry.
Hmm. "or other factual evidence provided directly to the licensed bail enforcer that confirms the identity and presence of the defendant within the dwelling house" sounds like they still don't actually need first hand eyes on knowledge that the person is in the house - just first hand knowledge from someone telling them the person is in the house. Of course if it turns out to be wrong it wasn't "factual" evidence, but that would be only be found out after the fact and potentially too late to do anyone any good.