Colburn just released his denouncement of Manchin-Toomey Proposal

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Dale00

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
7,575
Reaction score
4,154
Location
Oklahoma
Senator Coburn states
I’ll propose a consumer portal that would facilitate access to the NICS database at not just gun shows but for virtually all private sales.

How exactly does this portal work to ensure a false ID is not being used? And how does it prevent straw sales? What safeguards are there to insure no record is kept of the check? Can we be sure that the NSA is not filing it all away somewhere along with every other record of internet use etc.?

It would have done nothing to prevent most mass shooting including Sandy Hook, so why do it?
 

n2sooners

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
1,571
Reaction score
0
Location
Moore
Senator Coburn states

How exactly does this portal work to ensure a false ID is not being used? And how does it prevent straw sales? What safeguards are there to insure no record is kept of the check? Can we be sure that the NSA is not filing it all away somewhere along with every other record of internet use etc.?

It would have done nothing to prevent most mass shooting including Sandy Hook, so why do it?

It just makes information the government already has available to the public. Why not do it?
 

SMS

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
15,335
Reaction score
4,324
Location
OKC area
It just makes information the government already has available to the public. Why not do it?

I've been thinking that way too recently. Why can't I go into NICS with a name, a last 4, something, and see if an individual has a felony? I can do it in the State of Oklahoma with just a name (oscn, odcr) free of charge...why not at the federal level?

Make it open...less to hide. But then of course they'll come up with the "double secret probation" list that we still won't be able to see.

I don't, however, think that should be done as part of some background check mandate...I just think the system should be open and I should be able to use it free of charge if I choose...instead of paying a dealer to punch info into a computer to get the same info, or to call someone on the phone who will punch in the same info to tell me the same thing.
 

Dale00

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
7,575
Reaction score
4,154
Location
Oklahoma
It just makes information the government already has available to the public. Why not do it?

It creates an electronic "track." It is my understanding that the NSA stores all communications. While this raw stored data is not a gun registry I believe it could be searched to create one. Data mining is a very hot research area.
 

n2sooners

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
1,571
Reaction score
0
Location
Moore
It creates an electronic "track." It is my understanding that the NSA stores all communications. While this raw stored data is not a gun registry I believe it could be searched to create one. Data mining is a very hot research area.

It would be useless data since a search doesn't equal a sale. Anyone could use it at any time and there is no way for them to know which searches resulted in sales and which didn't.
 

SMS

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
15,335
Reaction score
4,324
Location
OKC area
It creates an electronic "track." It is my understanding that the NSA stores all communications. While this raw stored data is not a gun registry I believe it could be searched to create one. Data mining is a very hot research area.

NICS sure, but NCIC is just a query-able system that already exists. Open it up. Let us all see what's in there.

Just thinking out loud. I know it's not a 100% solution, and it wouldn't be perfect. I've run people through OSCN/ODCR before (baby sitters, their family, even some people I've sold guns too). I would use NCIC if I could.

But we are off on a tangent...LOL
 

Dale00

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
7,575
Reaction score
4,154
Location
Oklahoma
It would be useless data since a search doesn't equal a sale. Anyone could use it at any time and there is no way for them to know which searches resulted in sales and which didn't.

Did you see the story recently about the couple whose house was raided because they had purchased hydroponic gardening materials and supplies? The govt is is increasingly using data mining to try to detect crimes. I don't like the idea of giving them more data. Those who do not use the portal can be assumed to have much less chance of being gun owners. Maybe I'm being overly paranoid. They may already be able to identify most of us based on our internet activity.
 

n2sooners

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
1,571
Reaction score
0
Location
Moore
Did you see the story recently about the couple whose house was raided because they had purchased hydroponic gardening materials and supplies? The govt is is increasingly using data mining to try to detect crimes. I don't like the idea of giving them more data. Those who do not use the portal can be assumed to have much less chance of being gun owners. Maybe I'm being overly paranoid. They may already be able to identify most of us based on our internet activity.

I don't think it would be that big a deal. Obama would probably be the most searched person in the database. People would search their elected officials and celebrities. People would most likely end up using it for more than just firearm sales.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom