Complicit Propoganda Local Media.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

aestus

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
1,732
Reaction score
23
Location
Oklahoma City
As someone who has worked in broadcast media and in the printed news related industry in the past, I can assure you that it's not some conspiracy against firearms. Take off the tin foil hat.

In broadcast news, this is how it works. The producer comes in the morning (around 6 am) and hands out the assignments. The reporter then goes out with a camera crew and has maybe a couple of hours to interview, shoot the news, then either has to write the rest of the script to edit the news footage or go on to the next story. All reporters are hands on with editing, some may not do all of it but more often than not, in local news they are doing a lot of their own editing.

Unless it's a feature story or investigation, they don't have days to investigate or fact check. Most often, they will have 2-3 of these cases in one day and have to have all of this prepared and edited for either that day's 6pm news or 10 pm news or both. So basically they have about a 6-8 hour turn-around time to interview, write the script, and edit the footage before it goes live on air.

These people get paid barely over minimum wage. Broadcast news doesn't pay **** and most people can make more as a gas station clerk for $8-10/hr or waiting tables. I'm not exaggerating this. The only people who get paid decent are the primetime news anchors and one or two of the "star" reporters. People are in it because they really are passionate about delivering news to the people and love their job, not due to pay.

Oklahoma City is known to be the premier training ground for news talent, due to the fierce competition of all the news channels and the amount we have for such a small population. The majority of the "lesser" reporters are only here as part of an internship or as a launching ground to move into bigger markets like Chicago, LA, NY, ect. where they can actually make a decent wage. Otherwise, most of these people struggle to make any money.

Printed news is the same. Unless it's a feature story or investigative piece, writers must interview, research, write and proofread, collect photos and edit the story before 2-6pm (depending on what section of the paper it's in) so the layout editors can lay it out on a page and shoot it off to the printing press.

These papers have to be fully layed out, printed, rolled, have inserts added, packaged, loaded onto trucks, and into the hands of the delivery people by 4 am the next morning so you can get your paper.

Seriously, just sit and think about the sheer magnitude of it all and the short timeframes these reporters have to report the news. These guys may have several stories in the day that are due and in the case of The Oklahoman, also write up blogs, answer emails, and shoot video segments.

Needless to say, for television reporters and newsprint reporters, knowing the exact name/model/ of firearms being reported is way low on the priority.

Not everything is a conspiracy against firearms or a left/liberal or right/conservative agenda. Most is due to lack of time and having to use general assumptions about a topic to write a story to meet deadlines.
 

Bierhunter

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
2,230
Reaction score
3
Location
okieville
...
Having been in the media field (and joyously leaving) for 10 years has made me realize that all that "unbiased reporting" stuff they drilled into us in school means very little when it comes to news companies trying to make money. The higher the ratings (reach & frequency) they can earn, by either pissing off their viewers so much they keep watching in order to gripe about the bias, or by embracing other viewers such that those viewers also watch, the more money they can make in sales.

Many times, it just simply doesn't go so deep as the true views of the reporter or outlet.

That's probably the biggest reason I stopped watching network TV years ago. The news is nothing more than over dramatized BS (and the shows suck).

I haven't watched the news on TV for years. The so called journalists are pitifully disgusting.
 

redmax51

Sharpshooter
Joined
Dec 5, 2005
Messages
7,918
Reaction score
5
Location
Tulsa
I was watching Policewomen of Memphis the other day and one of the officers repeatedly called an SKS an AK-47. Ignorance knows no boundaries. :(



I can't believe you just admitted to watching that show.Women in it weren't as hot as the Police Women of Broward County.I liked the blonde one with the tig ole bitties!!
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
30,016
Reaction score
17,621
Location
Collinsville
As someone who has worked in broadcast media and in the printed news related industry in the past, I can assure you that it's not some conspiracy against firearms. Take off the tin foil hat.

In broadcast news, this is how it works. The producer comes in the morning (around 6 am) and hands out the assignments. The reporter then goes out with a camera crew and has maybe a couple of hours to interview, shoot the news, then either has to write the rest of the script to edit the news footage or go on to the next story. All reporters are hands on with editing, some may not do all of it but more often than not, in local news they are doing a lot of their own editing.

Unless it's a feature story or investigation, they don't have days to investigate or fact check. Most often, they will have 2-3 of these cases in one day and have to have all of this prepared and edited for either that day's 6pm news or 10 pm news or both. So basically they have about a 6-8 hour turn-around time to interview, write the script, and edit the footage before it goes live on air.

These people get paid barely over minimum wage. Broadcast news doesn't pay **** and most people can make more as a gas station clerk for $8-10/hr or waiting tables. I'm not exaggerating this. The only people who get paid decent are the primetime news anchors and one or two of the "star" reporters. People are in it because they really are passionate about delivering news to the people and love their job, not due to pay.
Oklahoma City is known to be the premier training ground for news talent, due to the fierce competition of all the news channels and the amount we have for such a small population. The majority of the "lesser" reporters are only here as part of an internship or as a launching ground to move into bigger markets like Chicago, LA, NY, ect. where they can actually make a decent wage. Otherwise, most of these people struggle to make any money.

Printed news is the same. Unless it's a feature story or investigative piece, writers must interview, research, write and proofread, collect photos and edit the story before 2-6pm (depending on what section of the paper it's in) so the layout editors can lay it out on a page and shoot it off to the printing press.

These papers have to be fully layed out, printed, rolled, have inserts added, packaged, loaded onto trucks, and into the hands of the delivery people by 4 am the next morning so you can get your paper.

Seriously, just sit and think about the sheer magnitude of it all and the short timeframes these reporters have to report the news. These guys may have several stories in the day that are due and in the case of The Oklahoman, also write up blogs, answer emails, and shoot video segments.

Needless to say, for television reporters and newsprint reporters, knowing the exact name/model/ of firearms being reported is way low on the priority.

Not everything is a conspiracy against firearms or a left/liberal or right/conservative agenda. Most is due to lack of time and having to use general assumptions about a topic to write a story to meet deadlines.

So you're freely admitting that accuracy in the news is not relevant to the stations/papers? They sure act like it is when they air commercials about how awesome they are and how you can always trust them. I could care less about their pay, deadlines and workload. If they expect me to trust their "news", then they damned well better get their facts straight!

When someone lies to me, I'm indifferent as to the reason. I now have reasonable cause to disbelieve what they're telling me. All you've done is admit that there's not a conspiracy against gun owners, but a broader conspiracy to ignore accuracy in reporting. If I can't trust them to get the facts straight on a narrow issue, it calls into question EVERY story they air or print.

News media outlets and reporters = :loser:

:disappoin
 

1shot(bob)

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
2,132
Reaction score
0
Location
Broken Arrow
So you're freely admitting that accuracy in the news is not relevant to the stations/papers? They sure act like it is when they air commercials about how awesome they are and how you can always trust them. I could care less about their pay, deadlines and workload. If they expect me to trust their "news", then they damned well better get their facts straight!

When someone lies to me, I'm indifferent as to the reason. I now have reasonable cause to disbelieve what they're telling me. All you've done is admit that there's not a conspiracy against gun owners, but a broader conspiracy to ignore accuracy in reporting. If I can't trust them to get the facts straight on a narrow issue, it calls into question EVERY story they air or print.

News media outlets and reporters = :loser:

:disappoin

Now you're catching on. They have more work to do than they can get done, and some have an agenda that they rely on to write their stories.

Remember an ex-mayor (democrat) that became a news reporter after he was fired from his mayor-ship? I did a story with him once because Barbara Bush was in town (Bush1 was still VP at the time). He edited the story himself. When it was finished it was a story about VP wives. Every single wife mentioned was a democrat. Barbara was only mentioned to get the piece going, as in "Barbara Bush was in town today, here some other VP wives". He did plenty of research, but only from his limited point of view.
A lot of reporters report what they are told, and only hear what they want to hear. If you believe anything they say you are crazy.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom