Congress Should Secretly Suspend 2nd Amendment Rights Says UCLA Professor

[RugersGR8]

Mods, I am saying up front that there is some profanity in the video. If you view the video and feel to goes to far, please feel free to delete thIs post and leave the second(Daily Caller). One of the profanity words in question has also been used in the Forum Rules("Don't be an ass"), so that word should not be a problem. But the reason I posted this is because I like what the Doctor of Common Sense has to say about the our 2nd Amendment Rights and the 1st Amendment Rights(and other Rights) of "people" like the UCLA professor(and the rest of the lib dem gun grabbers and haters).


Congress Should Secretly Suspend 2nd Amendment Rights Says UCLA Professor
The Doctor Of Common Sense
Published on Jun 15, 2016

 

[RugersGR8]

UCLA School of Law Professor = Adam Winkler

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/14/nyt-congress-should-secretly-suspend-second-amendment-rights/
NYTimes Editorial: Congress Should Secretly Suspend Second Amendment Rights
Casey Harper
1:30 PM 06/14/2016

 

[RugersGR8]

One very big thing that you have to keep in mind that the lib dems consider anyone(but themselves) as terrorists and that the "secret court" would deny the person included on the no-buy list the opportunity to rebut the attorney general’s evidence. This is something that lib dems dream about when thinking of draconian anti-gun legislation that GRABS POWER & CONTROL FOR THEIR AGENDA(S).

 

[RugersGR8]

Another lib dem Kool-Aid dispensing and Hillary lovin' prof(law professor David S. Cohen) wants to do away with gun rights:

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20160617/pro-clinton-college-professor-repeal-second-amendment
Pro-Clinton College Professor: Repeal Second Amendment!
Friday, June 17, 2016

At a time when it’s more important than ever to maintain the right of the American people to keep and bear arms for self-defense, law professor David S. Cohen is calling for repeal of the Second Amendment. “Americans’ rights are in mortal danger,” he says, unless Hillary Clinton is elected president and stacks the Supreme Court with progressive judges.

In the repeatedly discredited rag, Rolling Stone, Cohen writes, “sometimes we just have to acknowledge that the Founders and the Constitution are wrong. This is one of those times. . . . The Second Amendment needs to be repealed because it is outdated, a threat to liberty and a suicide pact.”

By “outdated,” Cohen means that the Framers of the Bill of Rights were unable to conceive of 19th century semi-automatic firearm technology. “When the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791, there were no weapons remotely like the AR-15 assault rifle (sic),” he said.

However, as the late, great Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, “Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.”

And in any case, there is nothing outdated about the underlying principle of the Second Amendment: to prohibit the government from interfering with the ability of people to acquire, possess and develop proficiency with arms they might one day need to defend themselves and their loved ones.

Cohen’s rant is just one example of an astonishing amount of sheer nonsense that has filled the Internet since the terrorist attack in Orlando. Anti-gun politicians, and so-called opinion columnists and TV talking heads – who pretend to be “experts” on every topic under the sun, but who in reality know virtually nothing about even one topic – are confidently calling the AR-15 an “automatic” weapon, a “military” weapon,” and a “weapon of war,” and telling everyone that the most popular rifle in America should be banned.

Of course, the First Amendment protects the right of pundits to demonstrate that the size of their egos are only matched by the depth of their ignorance on firearms and the Second Amendment. And so it should be.

If history repeats itself, the recent slew of half-baked, culture-war-based, ideologically-motivated, attention-seeking statements against guns will only increase support for the right to arms, and additional support may develop as people increasingly realize that President Obama and Hillary Clinton, who are urging gun bans, are the very politicians most responsible for the rise of overseas terrorist groups who inspire and possibly direct evildoers within our midst.

All the more reason for the American people to protect their right to protect themselves.

© 2016 National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action. This may be reproduced. This may not be reproduced for commercial purposes. 11250 Waples Mill Rd. Fairfax, VA 22030 1-800-392-8683(VOTE)

 

[dennishoddy]

UCLA School of Law Professor = Adam Winkler

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/14/nyt-congress-should-secretly-suspend-second-amendment-rights/
NYTimes Editorial: Congress Should Secretly Suspend Second Amendment Rights
Casey Harper
1:30 PM 06/14/2016

I would think this would be ruled illegal by the supreme court in short order. What hogwash.

 

[RugersGR8]

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/ly...il_job=1674083_06172016&s=al&dkt_nbr=od7ozsqa
Loretta Lynch Slaps FBI---No-Fly List Can Be Used to Ban Gun Buyers
Friday, 17 Jun 2016 11:32 AM
"Attorney General Loretta Lynch has overruled FBI Director James Comey on a key issue involving guns and terrorist watch lists — a move that two unlikely allies, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the National Rifle Association, oppose."...

 

[Fyrtwuck]

Secret meetings. Wasnt there a ban on magazines created somewhere on the east coast that happened that way in the middle of the night a couple of years ago. Limiting mag capacity to seven rounds IIRC.

 

[druryj]

They can kiss my ass.

 

[CorpsVet]

How about a secret court to suspend the freedom of the press?

 

[p238shooter]

"I would think this would be ruled illegal by the supreme court in short order. What hogwash."

If Hillary is elected most likely she will be involved in selection of the next 3 possibly 4 SCOTUS members, what then? We Might have to change our terminology to horsewash by then just to be PC. Just Saying