I think it was.That's not the question
I think it was.That's not the question
Thanks for the link.http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=SB1212 still isn't reporting a signature, and it's about as an authoritative source as you'll find.
He's asking, with a landslide vote, why would a veto even be a question to MaryI think it was.
Yes but it's slow to update. Real slow.http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=SB1212 still isn't reporting a signature, and it's about as an authoritative source as you'll find.
because it was not a landslide in the House.He's asking, with a landslide vote, why would a veto even be a question to Mary
House votes: 59/28 and 61/24http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=SB1212 still isn't reporting a signature, and it's about as an authoritative source as you'll find.
Lol!because it was not a landslide in the House.
If the house approved the emergency measure, they would have a hard time making the 75% if she vetoed.House votes: 59/28 and 61/24
It EASILY passed the house and was a "landslide" any way you cut it in the Senate. CHenry is exactly right on the basis of my question. For her to even have to consider signing tells me I want her gone ASAP.
Enter your email address to join: