At least we know what date to put on the BoR's headstone. As for who is persecuting the affected parties, it depends on the jurisdiction.
I thought (but could be wrong) that those convicted of misdemeanor domestic abuse have been prohibited since 1996 from owing a firearm ... which was why question 11.i on the 4473 is there.
https://www.justice.gov/usam/crimin...ons-possession-firearms-individuals-convicted
I thought (but could be wrong) that those convicted of misdemeanor domestic abuse have been prohibited since 1996 from owing a firearm
That appears to be what the SCOTUS upheld here.
Equate all of the stats above with how many fathers actually lived in the home with the demographic they studied and we might have a more complete study.I see the law as a way to disarm the poor, which in the end has always been the greatest threat to Tranny.
Browne, Salomon, & Bassuk (1999) found that women who resided in households that earned less than $10,000 annually had a 4-times-greater risk of experiencing violence than women in wealthier households.
- Bassuk et al. (1996) found that homeless mothers reported significantly more severe instances of physical and sexual assault over their lifetime than low-income housed mothers.
- Buka, Stichick, Birdthistle, & Felton, (2001) found youths from low-income neighborhoods witnessed significantly more severe violence (viz., murders and stabbings) than youths from middle- and upper-income neighborhoods.
I would agree. Do you think the number of evens would increase or decease if you only counted married households.Equate all of the stats above with how many fathers actually lived in the home with the demographic they studied and we might have a more complete study.
Enter your email address to join: