Six kids often by six different fathers.
What's the madness? It is none of your business if someone else has "enough" or "too many" or why not "too few" kids. The only real issue is government benefits - so simply cap them at some point - average family size, some percentage of average income - so that like anyone else if you had more children you would have to learn to adapt - pick a way.
Giving government benefits is a public policy decision - but having children is not the government's business. If you want have 10, but, the benefits should not be expected to grow with the number of children - private charity can fill that role if people desire to do give voluntarily.
Giving government benefits is a public policy decision - but having children is not the government's business. If you want have 10, but, the benefits should not be expected to grow with the number of children - private charity can fill that role if people desire to do give voluntarily.
Private charity never meets the need.
Government creates the need.
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
So... let me get this right. People say it's fine for employers to drug test because you have a choice if you want to work there or not (I happen to agree with this). But they also say it's infringing on a right of some sort if you must test to be given money without working that was earned by those willing to test? Is this what I'm hearing? Both can't be right. Seems they should prohibit employers testing or do welfare testing too.
Where was it said it was infringing on their rights?
Works every time.
Similar threads
