I don’t think you’re grasping the sheer volume of petroleum products they’re using. These oilers are not small ships—the Big Horn is about 3/4 the length of the USS New Jersey (BB-62) and almost 200’ longer than an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer—and they’re as big as they are for a reason.Maybe we need some form of airlift oil replenishment system. Maybe some form of gigantic bladders of oil towed to station by subs.
OK. Fine. Someone apply a little more innovation.I don’t think you’re grasping the sheer volume of petroleum products they’re using. These oilers are not small ships—the Big Horn is about 3/4 the length of the USS New Jersey (BB-62) and almost 200’ longer than an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer—and they’re as big as they are for a reason.
The only aircraft that could carry a useful amount of oil can’t land on a carrier, and none of the ships they’d be refueling can even come close to their stall speeds, so aerial refueling isn’t going to work. Even if you could develop a giant bladder that could survive being towed by a sub, the Navy isn’t going to saddle the cream of their war machine crop with resupply missions—after all, they outsourced that whole mission to the Military Sealift Command so they wouldn’t be saddled with it to begin with.
We can thank Obamanation for sending a few of our AOEs to the bottom as targets. The Kilauea and the Niagara Falls. Those were a few regulars that worked in my areas. All part of shrinking the ghost fleets. Im sure a few more are reefs now.I don’t think you’re grasping the sheer volume of petroleum products they’re using. These oilers are not small ships—the Big Horn is about 3/4 the length of the USS New Jersey (BB-62) and almost 200’ longer than an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer—and they’re as big as they are for a reason.
The only aircraft that could carry a useful amount of oil can’t land on a carrier, and none of the ships they’d be refueling can even come close to their stall speeds, so aerial refueling isn’t going to work. Even if you could develop a giant bladder that could survive being towed by a sub, the Navy isn’t going to saddle the cream of their war machine crop with resupply missions—after all, they outsourced that whole mission to the Military Sealift Command so they wouldn’t be saddled with it to begin with.
Sal points out in the video that they replaced military sailors on the support vessels with civilians because they could keep the civilians at sea longer. That makes no sense, which somehow makes sense in context…The USNS fleet is probably 90% civilians and every one of them are over worked.
It doesn’t matter if the carrier can sail around the world twenty times without refueling if it doesn’t have the jet fuel to launch the birds.I hope we can figure out how to remedy the replenishment at sea role, we are toast without a toaster if not.
Enter your email address to join: