Unless he is a FFL holder he has to have a FFL holder ship it to a FFL holder of your choice and then your FFL holder can do the transfer
No, he does not have to be an FFL holder. He does have to ship it to an FFL in the state that the purchaser resides.
Something to consider is the recieving FFL does not have to accept the package from a non-FFL shipper. Hint, check first!
Considering that an FFL holder can ship it USPS priority mail (instead of next day air (UPS/Fedex) that a non-FFL would have to legally use) it may be cheaper to have an FFL send the pistol to an in-state FFL to the purchaser.
No, he does not have to be an FFL holder. He does have to ship it to an FFL in the state that the purchaser resides.
Something to consider is the recieving FFL does not have to accept the package from a non-FFL shipper. Hint, check first!
Considering that an FFL holder can ship it USPS priority mail (instead of next day air (UPS/Fedex) that a non-FFL would have to legally use) it may be cheaper to have an FFL send the pistol to an in-state FFL to the purchaser.
Thats what I meant, it just didnt come out right
and if it goes through an FFL, then it would be actually registered to me. right?
as far as i know, both parties involved, the gun, and the transaction are perfectly legal, as long as it is shipped legally.
and i am not particularly concerned about whether or not it would be registered, but i'm sure not opposed to having one that doent have to be
.
Enter your email address to join: