All they will do now is wait and issue the citation after the drug dog arrives and does his business.
if I'm understanding ruling .. cops can only hold someone for long as reason they were originally stopped for.
All they will do now is wait and issue the citation after the drug dog arrives and does his business.
if I'm understanding ruling .. cops can only hold someone for long as reason they were originally stopped for.
A panel of the Eighth US Circuit Court of Appeals found that all a deputy has to do to seize cash from a person is say it is drug money.
That's always been the case absent "reasonable articulated suspicion". In the case referenced the officer did not have RAS but decided to detain the driver. The courts have always said you can detain with RAS, this idiot decided to detain without it and the courts slammed him for it.if I'm understanding ruling .. cops can only hold someone for long as reason they were originally stopped for.
That's always been the case absent "reasonable articulated suspicion". In the case referenced the officer did not have RAS but decided to detain the driver. The courts have always said you can detain with RAS, this idiot decided to detain without it and the courts slammed him for it.
Nothing changed except the courts said don't do this. You can and will be detained if the officer has RAS.
People keep rejoicing like this some major victory for freedom, but it's simply the courts clarifying what should have already been clear. And to most LEO'S it was.
Enter your email address to join: