Thanks,
It’s more about how my eyes and contact lens react than anything. I have an astigmatism which impacts what visualize. It is worse with my RMRs, and my Eotech. Less of an issue with my AimPoint PRO and the 507C. I run the red 507C. I recently got a green 507C and it is far worse with green than red. [emoji2371] I’m trying to avoid that mistake again.
I like how low JagerWerks is able to cut one on a Glock or I probably would just stick with a 507C.
View attachment 192314
View attachment 192315
chinese communist crap
Thanks,
It’s more about how my eyes and contact lens react than anything. I have an astigmatism which impacts what visualize. It is worse with my RMRs, and my Eotech. Less of an issue with my AimPoint PRO and the 507C. I run the red 507C. I recently got a green 507C and it is far worse with green than red. [emoji2371] I’m trying to avoid that mistake again.
I like how low JagerWerks is able to cut one on a Glock or I probably would just stick with a 507C.
View attachment 192314
View attachment 192315
I know you've said this, but big difference in the cut on the jagerwerks.
Yes they are chinese. They aren't crap though. Hey I would much prefer to have an American product myself but we haven't seen that from an American company yet unfortunately.
Here is my take on the "I want it to sit as low as possible". Yes lower is better, however getting an optic direct milled that low means you are kind of locked into that optic/footprint for that slide. I'll take a slightly higher height over bore with a plate system like C&H that allows me to maybe change to a different footprint via a plate if I can. That opens up options for me and allows me to keep being able to change to newer tech instead of having to buy a new slide. Cost of new plate+new optic < new slide+new milling+new optic
korean lil non commie south koreans made itTell us.... what american made device did you type that response on?
Enter your email address to join: