Houston Open Carry Incident With A Twist

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Cougar

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
427
Reaction score
12
Location
.
So has anyone found a statute that makes "failure to ID", in a situation like this, a crime in Texas?

The Texas law, that you quoted, only requires identification upon a lawful arrest. This individual was at no point (lawfully) under arrest.

The Supreme Court case of Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada states that stop and identify laws are only legal if the individual is being lawfully detained. In this case, even if he had been lawfully detained, he still committed no crime because Texas law does not require identification upon being detained, only upon being arrested.

However, the US Supreme court recently ruled that a detainment is still lawful even if the officer is detaining an individual based on the officer's misunderstanding of the law!!! So if the police officer in this case believed that Texas law required him to ID (even though it doesn't) the detainment, according to the recent supreme court ruling would have been lawful.

http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/heien-v-north-carolina/
 

twoguns?

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 29, 2009
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
28
Location
LTown to the Lst
Until a Good Barrister gets in involved.....

"So if the police officer in this case believed that Texas law required him to ID (even though it doesn't) the detainment, according to the recent supreme court ruling would have been lawful."

Then the contention would be that ....OH wait ...he erased the video...too bad for the tax paying citizen...
Papers , PLease...
 

SMS

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
15,335
Reaction score
4,324
Location
OKC area
The Texas law, that you quoted, only requires identification upon a lawful arrest. This individual was at no point (lawfully) under arrest.

The code specifically mentions detainment in section b(2).

But the way I read it, it doesn't require presentation of a state issued ID, it merely requires the individual to divulge name, address and DOB. I didn't see where the cop ever gave him a chance to to give that info…he asked for ID and then went straight to arrest when the guy said he wasn't carrying one.

Wonder if we will ever hear about the outcome of the IA investigation.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom