I ask because the general definition of trespassing includes: "The main element of the tort is "interference". This must be both direct and physical, with indirect interference instead being covered by negligence or nuisance. "Interference" covers any physical entry to land, as well as the abuse of a right of entry, when a person who has the right to enter the land does something not covered by the permission."
So where does a concealed carrier stand on the end of trespassing laws? Walking through the doors of a public business that's not specified in the SDA law book that has a gun buster sign they are entering property they have a right to be on, yet they are doing so in violation of advertised permissions.
I know most here, including my SDA instructor, will say "well, it's concealed for a reason, what they know won't hurt them", but that doesn't mean it's not in violation of trespassing laws. So, I would like to think that a business owner or official for a business with a posted gun-buster sign would politely ask you to leave before callin' tha law, but do they have the ground to immediately call the law and have you arrested for trespassing before giving you the chance to leave?
So where does a concealed carrier stand on the end of trespassing laws? Walking through the doors of a public business that's not specified in the SDA law book that has a gun buster sign they are entering property they have a right to be on, yet they are doing so in violation of advertised permissions.
I know most here, including my SDA instructor, will say "well, it's concealed for a reason, what they know won't hurt them", but that doesn't mean it's not in violation of trespassing laws. So, I would like to think that a business owner or official for a business with a posted gun-buster sign would politely ask you to leave before callin' tha law, but do they have the ground to immediately call the law and have you arrested for trespassing before giving you the chance to leave?