I can't understand how they can try Mr.Ersland for murder if he had a legal right to fire the first shot and if the first shot killed the young man and then he fired five more shot into his body, how can you murder a dead man?
This whole thing is just screwy. I have a feeling he is going to get off, but im not sure its going to be because he is innocent.
It's beginning to sound like a few OKC legal types slept through ethics in law school.
Enter your email address to join: