If they were "adamantly opposed" now, they were "adamantly opposed" at jury selection and lied when they were asked if they could impose the death penalty when questioned during voir dire. I guarantee you every potential juror was asked that question then because every prosecutor in a murder trial will ask that at that time. So, they are just liars.
I agree with you but there is no law that says that people who oppose the death penalty have to be rejected from the jury because of that.....or they are just liars.
To be fair, the story I saw didn't specify if she was "adamantly opposed" in all cases, or just this particular case.
I'd agree; every jury is asked if they could consider the entire range of punishment. But they don't always tell the truth. Or, when faced with actually imposing a sentence, they get weak in the knees, so to speak.
Id rather he be shanked in prison rather than a painless death
Bad thing about this sentence. Some stupid mother****ing democrat(s) will release him in the future. I can almost guarantee it won't really be a life sentence.
That is probably right.
I really think he should be stoned by victims family members in a public place.
One of the best things about a death sentence is the assholes actually stay in jail, even if they are never put to death.
Juror claims she was threatened by fellow juror in Parkland school shooting case
Prosecutors filed a motion Thursday asking the court to authorize law enforcement to interview a juror in the Parkland case who called them to say she was threatened by a fellow juror while in the jury room.
The plot thickens…
I think that either death or LWOP would have been the right sentence in this case.
Similar threads
