Well, think of it from the auctioneer perspective trying to get an estate to contract with them to sell the collection. Would you rather say to the estate, you pay a 10% commission or, you pay a 25% commission? 10% commission probably let's them get more auctions.Yes, I understand that auction services are a business trying to make money yet no one has explained this “buyer’s premium”. Still makes no sense to me.
Example:
I purchased a used gun from Cabela’s a few years ago. I paid the asking price shown on the gun along with tax - no buyer’s premium.
Did Cabela’s make money on this sale? You bet they did. I imagine the original owner of the gun got paid less than 70% of what Cabela’s sold the gun to me for.
Same thing with several farm actions I have gone to and made purchases at. Again, I paid for the items I purchased at the price the item was sold to me at the auction. Taxes were added to that price (taxes aren’t added if you have a farm tax number).
Back to the auction in this discussion. It just seems like “double dipping” to me.
Auction house charges a commission to the seller and then another fee on the buyer.
Questions:
1) When do “buyer’s premiums” come into affect? Is this a random thing or is there a set of rules out there somewhere defining just when to add? Like I mentioned in a previous post, I’ve made purchases through Ebay, Gunbroker, farm actions, and estate auctions - never paid a buyer’s premium.
2) Are you taxed on the buyer’s premium itself? If I pay $100 for the item w/ a 15% BP, am I taxed on $100 or $115.
3) Should we all start adding a “buyer’s premium” to any guns we have listed here on OSA?
…question 3 -
I'll bet there's some psychology involved in the buyers premium too.