I think stand your ground carries immunity, but this wasn't stand your ground. Would be weird for there to be immunity on one and not the other, but basic self defense has been around a lot longer and maybe they just didn't think to add it.
Is he immune? Because I was hearing today that they are still considering it? I think it was the TM family attorney or one of them. I'm pretty sure he's Crump's law partner.
I don't know whether FL law is like ours or not, but I was thinking that ours was modeled after the FL law. It wouldn't surprise me that he is in fact immune and that it gets filed and heard anyway after the criminal fiasco.
A lot of people are crying discrimination. Isn't Zimmerman Hispanic? Frankly, this whole thing was a collision of two idiots.
If they do, it will get dismissed very quickly. It's the federal civil rights violation case he'll have to worry about.
That's going to be pretty hard to prove too. It has already been ruled that the shooting was self defense, so all they have is the fact he followed him. But is it a civil rights violation for a Hispanic male to follow a black male and think he looks suspicious? And wouldn't they need to prove first that he has racist tendencies? A guy who has a black great(?) grandfather, who mentors black kids, who took on the Sanford police in the beating death of a homeless black man by a policeman's kid forcing the chief of police into early retirement, and then arguing for the removal of his pension? I'd say they will have a hard time proving that this guy has a racist bone in his body. But I wouldn't put it past them to try.
That's going to be pretty hard to prove too. It has already been ruled that the shooting was self defense, so all they have is the fact he followed him. But is it a civil rights violation for a Hispanic male to follow a black male and think he looks suspicious? And wouldn't they need to prove first that he has racist tendencies? A guy who has a black great(?) grandfather, who mentors black kids, who took on the Sanford police in the beating death of a homeless black man by a policeman's kid forcing the chief of police into early retirement, and then arguing for the removal of his pension? I'd say they will have a hard time proving that this guy has a racist bone in his body. But I wouldn't put it past them to try.
A DOJ civil rights case against George Zimmerman following a "not guilty" verdict would be political suicide. A black president has his black AG, under pressure from the NAACP, drag a Hispanic guy back into court for killing a black kid?
Yeah, that's gonna play out just great for the Democrats in 2014.
I was actually really impressed with what I read right up until the part where he equated lawful self defense with gun violence.
If they do, it will get dismissed very quickly. It's the federal civil rights violation case he'll have to worry about.
That's going to be pretty hard to prove too. It has already been ruled that the shooting was self defense, so all they have is the fact he followed him. But is it a civil rights violation for a Hispanic male to follow a black male and think he looks suspicious? And wouldn't they need to prove first that he has racist tendencies? A guy who has a black great(?) grandfather, who mentors black kids, who took on the Sanford police in the beating death of a homeless black man by a policeman's kid forcing the chief of police into early retirement, and then arguing for the removal of his pension? I'd say they will have a hard time proving that this guy has a racist bone in his body. But I wouldn't put it past them to try.
Enter your email address to join: