Official OSA COVID-19/Corona Virus Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.

MacFromOK

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 11, 2016
Messages
13,759
Reaction score
14,758
Location
Southern Oklahoma
Ever heard of sampling size? Granted Oklahoma is probably pretty unhealthy overall, but the more you test, the likelihood that number will go down significantly.
Lol, yeah... it's one of the voodoos that pollsters use. :D

Granted, a larger sample size will be more accurate, but there's no guarantee the results will go up or down.

By your claim, if TX has tested 5x the people Ok has, yet has 7x the population, then we've tested a larger percentage of our population.

So why isn't OK's testing more accurate?
:drunk2:
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
21,852
Reaction score
13,735
Location
Under your bed
93640533_2977011392342530_751861633214578688_n.jpg
 

JD8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
32,954
Reaction score
46,080
Location
Tulsa
Lol, yeah... it's one of the voodoos that pollsters use. :D

Granted, a larger sample size will be more accurate, but there's no guarantee the results will go up or down.

By your claim, if TX has tested 5x the people Ok has, yet has 7x the population, then we've tested a larger percentage of our population.

So why isn't OK's testing more accurate?
:drunk2:



Let me simplify it. When Covid 19 was just getting started, there were a numbers that were showing 10% mortality rates because of small testing sampling, that number got smaller and smaller. Of the 10 states that have over 100K tests, only 2 have a rate of 5% or near, one being NY. You can either believe me and those numbers or not, don't care. Just relaying that mortality rates seem to be inaccurate due to testing variables and low numbers and the fact that many people are asymptomatic.
 

JD8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
32,954
Reaction score
46,080
Location
Tulsa
Ok... but how does that figure into testing sick people? Don't symptoms determine who gets tested?
106176-8f0090b7cee06ce6a86d722a4658fb7a.jpg

So the more people you test, the more likely it is that you'll a good number of asymptomatic individuals. Then, the numbers of individuals that had the virus would go up, the mortality rate down. If you are only testing people that are showing clinical symptoms, you will show a higher rate of mortality. Example, when South Korea started doing drive thru testing, their mortality rate numbers went down. The number of people that are asymptomatic have been estimated from 50-80% what I have seen. Granted, that's a huge range and needs to be better identified , but it does show there are a significant amount of people out there that would test positive with no symptoms.
 

Oklahomabassin

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
25,169
Reaction score
24,081
Location
America!
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top Bottom