OK State House Passes Expansion of Right to Bear Arms

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
1,480
Reaction score
1,122
Location
OKC
Its a systematic effort to defy Washington DC. In hopes of letting Oklahomans know that they are in a pro gun, pro gun accessory, anti regulation of braces (to the complaint of those who dislike the term common item) and any other silliness imposed by the feds. For every state that passes legislation that is pro gun OR proposes legislation to loosen the regulation of firearms, other states leadership take notes as to how the federal govt responds, whether it agrees or argues against. This allows people to seek fallacies on both sides so they (the pro gun states leadership) may continue to draft and propose pro gun legislation that will corner the anti gunners in government and make them look like fools. But its slow, a very slow and painful process. Why you ask? Because we dont just hang people and throw Tea Parties anymore.
I agree with most of what you said, but your last sentence is partially why our government no longer fears or works for the people anymore. We are back to nobles and peasants.
 

Seadog

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
5,860
Reaction score
7,452
Location
Boondocks
I don't trust any of them.

"We must pass it, to see what is in it."
The infamous quote of nasty Nancy Pelosi pushing the Obama care act is not exactly pertinent to the coverage of this topic. Despicable Democrats voted a long party lines against the bill. That tells me pretty much all I need to know about this bill.
 

turkeyrun

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
10,313
Reaction score
11,062
Location
Walters
It is an election, they must show that they represent us and are working hard.

What could be better than a worthless law, written with ambiguous language leading to multiple interpretation?
2A is explicit and libs try to twist the language.

There is absolutely no law that should be 1100 pages. Any bill should be 1 line item. Not add pork or hide obscure items, nothing. "We must pass to see" is BS

Before a new law is debated, an old, obsolete, useless law should be presented for removal and the new, replacement law put forth.

Laws about cars pulling over to allow 🐎 unimpeded travel and other unenforced laws need to be removed.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
6,532
Reaction score
5,680
Location
Kingfisher County
If there is a Second Amendment law that is needed, it is punish any and all government entities, officials, legislators, employees, and executives who violate the Second Amendment. Anything that renders the people vulnerable to any despot, tyrant, oligarch, dictator, or other form of government other than the Constitution is a traitor, plain and simple.

Woody
 

PBramble

Let's Eat
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
2,980
Reaction score
3,995
Location
OKC
If there is a Second Amendment law that is needed, it is punish any and all government entities, officials, legislators, employees, and executives who violate the Second Amendment. Anything that renders the people vulnerable to any despot, tyrant, oligarch, dictator, or other form of government other than the Constitution is a traitor, plain and simple.

Woody
Already exists.

1714315601389.png
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom