Him not owning the place doesn't come into play. It wasn't justice it was PC . It was simple neglect on his part. I think he got a pass like the Portland rioters because of color of his skin. You are right that it isn't a justice system.
OKC Man Acquitted Of Manslaughter After His Dogs Fatally Attacked An 82-Year-Old Woman
- Thread starter NationalMatch
- Start Date
If that woman had a gun wed be having a different conversation imo
This verdict is odd considering Oklahoma's laws on dogs. All dogs, friendly or aggressive, are to be kept in a secure enclosure when outside, and your fenced yard is not considered secure due to most of Oklahoma being a rear easement system. A kennel or special built dog run is what is needed. The reason for this is so utilities can have dogs removed from yards when easement access is needed unless they are in a secure enclosure away from the easement area. I've had this conversation with many a home owner while trying to get access to our pedestals in my job (even had to call the cops 3 times to enforce easement access, got access all three times). So for them to rule not guilty surely smacks of a pc ruling rather than a lawful ruling. I hope he gets eviscerated in civil court.
Guy probably doesn't have a pot to piss in. The family will never see anything even if they do win.
Similar story, but EXYF was injured, not killed by a loose pit that escaped a back yard fence. One of my dogs was killed, the other had $800 vet bills getting sewn back up. Lawyer went after their homeowners insurance, recovered $50k (before lawyer fees).
What if they charged him with a different crime?
Has to be entirely different evidence and timeline, if I'm not mistaken.
I don’t agree with it either.
The owner knew the dogs were aggressive. They were possibly fight dogs. He did not take measures to keep them secured in the property. He could have built a chain link pen. It’s not that expensive.
If my big dog attacked someone, I’d put a bullet in her myself. My dachshunds on the other hand would lick the skin off their ankles.
His attorney did his job. I agree that the family needs to file a civil suit.
The owner knew the dogs were aggressive. They were possibly fight dogs. He did not take measures to keep them secured in the property. He could have built a chain link pen. It’s not that expensive.
If my big dog attacked someone, I’d put a bullet in her myself. My dachshunds on the other hand would lick the skin off their ankles.
His attorney did his job. I agree that the family needs to file a civil suit.
Wasn’t at the trial to see/hear any evidence. Sounds like the defense lawyer showed up and prosecution phoned it in.
Civil suit probably not worth it for a man who probably doesn’t have much, if any of a net worth.
A month or so ago a coworker was having a hard time after having to find someone not guilty of raping a child. Just wasn’t beyond a doubt even though all the jury thought it was likely he was guilty. Unless you can talk to someone on the jury, you just won’t know why.
Civil suit probably not worth it for a man who probably doesn’t have much, if any of a net worth.
A month or so ago a coworker was having a hard time after having to find someone not guilty of raping a child. Just wasn’t beyond a doubt even though all the jury thought it was likely he was guilty. Unless you can talk to someone on the jury, you just won’t know why.
Sad deal.
He owned 'em. They killed a lady out in the street, not in their yard.
He should be in prison.
Life ain't fair. Never has been. Get's less fair every GD day.
Bad damn deal.
He owned 'em. They killed a lady out in the street, not in their yard.
He should be in prison.
Life ain't fair. Never has been. Get's less fair every GD day.
Bad damn deal.
Similar threads
