It mattersIt doesn't matter you can't lay hands on a cop , you may not like it but its the law.
It mattersIt doesn't matter you can't lay hands on a cop , you may not like it but its the law.
He looked to be 75 or 80. He wasnt a threat because he put a finger on the cop. Cop could have easily grabbed his arm, spun him around, carefully, and cuffed him. No reason at all to body slam him head first into the pavement.It matters
You're still wrong read the statute its agnostic of the amount of force used , be it a finger, fist or hard shove . The minute the old man told him to shut up and touched him it was game on. The cop could have and should have used more restraint , but the old man commited a felonyIt matters
It doesn't matter you can't lay hands on a cop , you may not like it but its the law.
I know, I know, I directed fire to the wrong coordinate , I apologize, I'm old and confused, I should have been body slammed like all 80 year old men. I wish you the best.I don’t think you understand what I was saying, I’m in complete agreement with you. That was my point. The guy said he shoved the cop when all he did was touch his vest…. Geez
Ok, so he should have professionally arrested the tiny old man and the DA could file felony charges against him for touching the cop with his fingers.You're still wrong read the statute its agnostic of the amount of force used , be it a finger, fist or hard shove . The minute the old man told him to shut up and touched him it was game on. The cop could have and should have used more restraint , but the old man commited a felony
I think he should be fired, and face the same charges as the old man. The level of physical aggression which resulted in such a gross injury, outweighs the normal legal protections provided by civil code. Circumstances are everything.Ok, so he should have professionally arrested the tiny old man and the DA could file felony charges against him for touching the cop with his fingers.
But he didn't. He lost his cool and overreacted.
I'll type slow for you here.You're still wrong read the statute its agnostic of the amount of force used , be it a finger, fist or hard shove . The minute the old man told him to shut up and touched him it was game on. The cop could have and should have used more restraint , but the old man commited a felony
I see that every day in liberal states where officers are pushed and shoved with impunity by "social" protesters in the streets. They have no respect for the law because they are not punished for what they did.If there are no consequences, then why can't we all just bully police and get away with it which leads to violent crimes against police increasing.
I'll type slow for you here.
I'm not arguing the statute but some common sense on the part of the cop was WELL in order. I don't give 2 ***** if he got pissed that the old man told him to shut up. Cop was NEVER in any danger and possibly talking to a man with mental difficulties.
(Maybe I am to).
Enter your email address to join: