Yul Brynner spoke to us via the TV and told us to stop smoking after he done died, and he still ain't shut up. No surprise.
Im gay. Im a dad. Im married to a woman. I eat little blue pills. I get a testosterone shot every 2 weeks. I dont even have all the genitals i was born with. My boobs are larger than they once were. Sometimes I cry.
I served in the military when gays couldnt. I served under dont as dont tell. I even told.
Both of my daughters are bi-racial. One daughter even dated a black guy then dumped him for a Puerto rican fella. My oldest daughter was born in spain, shes a citizen of spain.
Ive dated black girls too, even other races. Ive been in the sack with a guy...a couple of times in fact. Ill spare you the details but it was fun. Ive showered naked with guys. Ive compared wankys a few times. Only lost once. So im kinda a champion as well.
I have a huge collection of guns and cookbooks. Sometimes I grow flowers.
Im cool with my sexuality, im cool with who I am. No closet for me.
If ya wanna know anything else just ask.
It really isnt hard to admit your gay. In fact me n you prolly have alot of "gay stuff" in common. Im sure youve done alotta the same gay stuff ive done. The difference is im not afraid to admit it.
Indulge me.
This is the most reasonable post I've seen on OSA in some time.
Good job.
Im surprise so many of you are for this I guess. Props to those few who have stood up in this thread for they think is right.
My 2 cents is that as a Christian a sin is a sin. It doesn't matter if it is sex outside of marriage, lust, stealing or whatever. I don't look at gay people any different than I look at any other sinner, or how I look at my own sins. I do not hate them or dislike them any more than I hate a friend who lives with his girlfriend. Being considered a bigot by people just because you disagree with the sins someone commits is asinine.
As far as gay marriage is concerned, besides the fact that I think it is wrong, I understand how the government can rule the way it has. But I think it has opened the door for other perversions to have their definition of marriage sponsored by the government. What about polygamy? How can any of you who argue this is ok, not argue the same way with polygamy? Its very similar and eventually someone will challenge it in court. If the state can not ban gay marriage based on discrimination how can it ban polygamy? Also what about if someone wanted to marry their brother/sister? Still both consenting adults, which is the argument many make regarding gay marriage? These rulings open the door for both of these perversions. Eventually, someone will challenge these laws in court and use the recent rulings. I hope no ones story changes then.
Perversion perhaps, but why should polygamy be illegal?
What evil consequences will occur if we open that door?
Enter your email address to join: