Lemme see if I got this straight. The blissninnies search and scoured every nook and cranny of the newspapers and net, and the BEST examples they could come up with to support regulating toy guns as if they are real, are these three:
All three of which, if true, are actually beneficial to society by removing these criminally-threatening (and stupid) people from the gene pool?
Seems to me like this is an argument that the status quo is working very VERY well.
Canadians are even stupider than our politicians from the N.E. part of the country (and Ill and Calif). And that's really saying something.
* Jan. 16, 2010, Edmonton: Bernadette Auger, 48, was fatally shot by police at an Edmonton apartment while holding an air-gun replica of a Sig Sauer handgun and failing to respond to police commands.
* March 6, 2009, Ottawa: Bank robbery suspect Paul Jeffrey, 27, was shot and killed by police after pointing a replica pistol at police and threatening to shoot.
* Oct. 13, 2006, Burnaby, B.C.: Daniel Antony King, 37, was shot to death by police after getting out of a car holding a replica gun following a car chase.
All three of which, if true, are actually beneficial to society by removing these criminally-threatening (and stupid) people from the gene pool?
Seems to me like this is an argument that the status quo is working very VERY well.
Canadians are even stupider than our politicians from the N.E. part of the country (and Ill and Calif). And that's really saying something.