In my experience, once you have the brace strapped to your arm, you cannot look down the sights in the traditional manner since you cannot shoulder the weapon. As a makeshift stock, I guess it will work....but it's not perfect.
Anyone else have one of these yet? I just got mine in today and installed on my Yugo PAP92 PV. I'm not sure about the whole "brace" idea but it does seem like it will make a good "stock". I'll have a better idea when I get some range time with it.
http://www.atlanticfirearms.com/com...s/sb47-stabilizing-brace-detail.html?Itemid=0
The ATF is the only one that can regulate the manufacture or making of NFA items. States still have the right to say whether they can be possessed within its borders and LEO's across the country are required to enforce the laws of their jurisdiction.... no matter how f*ck*ng stupid some of them are.
What a world it would be if only the ATF could arrest you for sawing off a shotgun, making your own suppressor, or converting your AR to FA. It would either be a utopia for enthusiasts or they would have 10-100x the number of agents to police alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives.
In my experience, once you have the brace strapped to your arm, you cannot look down the sights in the traditional manner since you cannot shoulder the weapon. As a makeshift stock, I guess it will work....but it's not perfect.
Strap it to your arm and it's legal. Shoulder it and it becomes an unregistered SBR. Fine line.
In Washington state, people have been arrested for using the sig brace as a stock. Police there have been reported to say that they will arrest anyone seen who misuses the sig brace as a stock.
Do you have a link to your source? I'm still active on a couple of Washington gun forums where the brace has been discussed a lot and I haven't heard about arrests or threats. Since WA prohibits SBRs, this brace has become quite popular.
Enter your email address to join: