Did I miss something... Bloomberg was saying 90% of the people want stricter gun laws, the polls I'v seen posted (mostly links on here) do not back this up and wondering why LaPierre didn't jump all over his numbers. Other than that thought LaPierre did a good job.
I still don't get why anyone could posibly believe any of this will make any difference except to be a pain for law abiding gun owners. As we all know, the bad guys are not going to care what laws are passed.
Bloomberg is lying of course.
90% of people polled in a left poll say they want background checks, but ask these same people if they will want registration and see how many say yes. Explain to them the historical basis of how registration leads to confiscation, and then poll them. The 90% number is a hoakey, manufactured number.
another argument is that even if 90% plus people wanted stricter gun laws, the question is: are they constitutional?
Just because 90% plus people want to ban freedom of speech on the Internet does not mean it is constitutional.
A natural, God-given right is a natural God given right.
also, love how Bloomberg AND that ape-like creature who is the host, kept begging for background checks. Sounds so reasonable, doesn't it?
For a look at why these lefty useful idiots really want UBCs, check this thread out:
https://www.okshooters.com/showthre...ration-of-all-weapons&highlight=show+loophole
Last edited: