They are not going to let medics enter the residence until it is secure.
That seems like it could imperil officers in the event that they get injured. Is there a different procedure in those cases?
They are not going to let medics enter the residence until it is secure.
That seems like it could imperil officers in the event that they get injured. Is there a different procedure in those cases?
I tend to believe that "no knock" should be used in only the gravest extreme, or with totally overwhelming evidence. Evidence where someone is willing to bet their career on it.
They are not going to let medics enter the residence until it is secure.
The wife was hiding in the closet on the phone for over 5 minutes.
They still had to finish primary and secondary searches of residence before allowing medics in. This would not be a quick undertaking due to the fact they have already fired shots, a "barricaded" woman had already been removed (after 5 minutes hiding), and a child was still in the residence.
The medics were on scene in two minutes...
1 hour and 14 minutes later they heard the call on the radio that the man was dead.
What "rules" caused that? I'm still having trouble reconciling it and your rebuttal to things that I didn't say doesn't help me to find an explaination at all.
Pretty much as I quoted before:
Where do you read that she was "barricaded" for "over 5 minutes"?
Even then... why would it matter if the wife was hiding for all of 5 minutes?
My understanding is that she telephoned 911 immediately upon seeing armed men outside and medical responders were on site 2 minutes after that.
I'd hardly refer a scared woman hiding with a young child "barricaded". Nonetheless, if your intent was to imply that her actions caused her husband to expire, you're wrong. She clearly stated that she was by his side pleading with LE to get medical help and he was still alive during that time.
So... either she's lying. Or those are true facts. I'm going on the assumption that they are true and using that and the emergency responder records of the timeframe as a basis for my question.
WHY did LE not allow medical responders in AT ALL according to reports and kept them at bay for 1 hour and 14 minutes only to announce over the radio at that time the man had died.
I'm not trying to fight with you penismighter, I just think my question is valid and deserves some logical and thoughtful discussion and explaination.
This is what puzzles me about how civilian law enforcement has selectively implemented military style tactics. You're operating on home soil where American citizens are present. You're following law enforcement procedures to secure a scene so as to not further endanger the lives of non-combatants. Why not require a medic to be on the SWAT team as most every military unit in a combat zone prefers to have? The medic could immediately perform lifesaving measures on a team member, or any civilian injured during the raid, while other sworn personnel complete the search and secure the scene. Our military doesn't wait till the battle is over to adminster first aid, why should our law enforcement while employing military style tactics?
If you can afford a SWAT team, can you afford to NOT have a mmedic? You'd think our citizens and brave LEO's would deserve better.
I used the term "barricaded" very lightly, and did not intend on you thinking that I felt she was barricaded. However, It could easily be argued that someone hiding in a closet, putting her child in front of her to keep from being shot (which she states on the 911 call) and not coming out of the house for over 5 minutes, could be considered barricaded given the situation.
I'm not implying that her actions caused anything. I am simply stating that due to the circumstances, the medics would have not been able to immediately enter the house for the previously stated reasons.
And what tactics should not be used on US citizens? Knock and annouce warrants, because that is what this was. It sounds like the wife saw one of the cover guys setting up on a window, she flipped and called here husband who had then hide and goes to get an AR. The entry team realizes what's goining on, breaches, meets husband with a rifle and responds appropriately. What tactic there should not have been used? Granted, that situation is speculation. Pretty much every post in this thread has been a knee jerk or speculation by people with no expierence in this matter, so I think my proposal of what happened should be taken with at least as much, if not more weight.This whole story just puts a knot in my stomach, it kinda tear me up to think if police were to were to get a tip from some low-life criminal trying to save his own skin, what would go down here in my house under simular circumstances. I just don't think these kind of tactics should be used on American citizens unless some sort of immediate danger warrants it.
Enter your email address to join: