I am hearing that the de-escalation was a planned event to reduce the number of protesters and that they are going to be charging in soon. Not sure if that is BS or not.
The land doesn't belong to the BLM. They manage it for the American public. If the American public is prohibited from benefiting from the land, then are they really doing their jobs? Has the BLM proven that grazing the 500 cattle there have resulted in any tortoise deaths over the past 20 years?
Seems that it ended well for now. I am sure the federal authorities will be back. I had seen some video and am really surprise the feds did not arrest anyone as it seemed many militia there to help the ranchers had guys with their hands on guns. I saw lots of feds with guns drawn, but don't recall if any of the ranchers or militia had their weapons drawn.
As for protecting a turtle, that's a noble cause.
If it's not his land and the owner asked him to leave he should leave. As for protecting a turtle, that's a noble cause.
I don't principally disagree with you, but it appears that the burden of proof does not lie with the BLM when it comes to the alleged protection of America's shelled creatures.
How do easements like this work on public land? If this land is closed, isn't the rancher free to find his own alternative public or private land?
as for the tortoise, if you believe that's what this is really all about then i've got some ocean front property in clark county nevada i'd like to sell you!
alleged protection of america's shelled creatures.
Actually, the feds DO own the land, as updated in this thread (page 17, post #238 if you're counting):
https://www.okshooters.com/showthre...y-the-FEDS-and-confiscating-his-cattle/page16
As for the tortoise, if you believe that's what this is really all about then I've got some ocean front property in Clark County Nevada I'd like to sell you!
what "side" are you on? I suppose you saw it possibly had to do with Harry Reid and the Chinese solar energy company or something?
Enter your email address to join: