The Obama Gun Ban That Isn't

[nemesis]

http://gunnuts.net/2012/11/28/the-obama-gun-ban-that-isnt/

 

[jfssms]

Sweet...these D Bags are done. Wait until tomorrow.

 

[poopgiggle]

But then what inane crap will I post about on forums!

 

[ignerntbend]

Look, Mr. Giggle, as long as it continues to show up in our email boxes, it will continue to be true.
Nothing said on a George Sorros funded "gunnut" site is going to change that.

 

[JB Books]

http://bluesteeldemocrats.blogspot.com/2009/03/65-congressional-democrats-tell-holder.html

So, guys, are all Dems bad? (Wait, Hell, I ought know how you will answer! ha ha ha)

 

[TonyRumore]

Aren't there several Pro-Gun Democrats in office as well? I thought I read that somewhere when they controlled both houses, but still didn't have enough anti-gun votes to do anything.

 

[JB Books]

Shhhhh Tony, that logic flies in the mass of the self-pitying fear we all like to feel. When Obama had his majority in both houses, he did nothing about guns.

Wait!!!! I am dead wrong! He did do something. He expanded our rights to carry on Federal land. Damn him for his gun interference!!!!!

 

[poopgiggle]

Logic doesn't drive gun sales or NRA donations.

 

[TonyRumore]

And don't forget the ATF shotgun study where ATF reversed it's earlier position on Pistol Grips.......now saying they are no longer an assault weapon feature and are a standard "sporting" item on shotguns. Unfortunately, no one bothered to actually read the study, or they would have known that we actually gained some ground there.

 

[nemesis]

Also, on another thread someone opined O'Bummer would accomplish his nefarious goals by executive order. No can do and it can't happen.

The Supreme Court ruled in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 (1952) that Executive Order 10340 from President Harry S. Truman placing all steel mills in the country under federal control was invalid because it attempted to make law, rather than clarify or act to further a law put forth by the Congress or the Constitution. Presidents since this decision have generally been careful to cite which specific laws they are acting under when issuing new executive orders.