I think the Navy is well aware of what happened to the Cole and they’re prepared to take care of that. My guess would be that accounts of the current situation are exaggerated based on the photographic evidence. Lots of cameras on those ships.
@ignerntbend we could do the alternative and go back to the way it was under your boy obummer. https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/30/navy-commander-surrendered-to-iran-to-protect-obam/
That’s a pretty good example. We made a navigational error and the ship and crew were held fourteen hours, then released. We would have done the same with a Canadian ship that made a navigational error.
And you have to read pretty deeply into that article to see that we were actually in Iranian waters. Any Navy on earth would have investigated that situation.
edit: I’m referring to link posted be Neckbeard, not what was posted in the op
edit: I’m referring to link posted be Neckbeard, not what was posted in the op
So tell me how those cameras can detect explosives in the hull of the pleasure craft operating at distances that can sink a US Ship and kill sailors?
No we wouldn't.
In this latest incident with iran they are in international waters.
So I say deep six the Iranian boats.
Just my opinion. HOOYAH
So I say deep six the Iranian boats.
Just my opinion. HOOYAH
pretty sure they can take a picture of a gun boat ten feet off the hull.
We might detain them for less than fourteen hours, but don’t pretend we wouldn’t take a look.
Now if we caught an Iranian War Ship in our waters, we might detain it for fourteen hours and fifteen minutes. Don’t say we wouldn’t.
So they can see the explosives within the hull when the boat is running by at 30 mph?
Similar threads
