I'll add to that and say that the only thing that can save the republic is a modern day George Washington. Someone to come in and use the same tactics as the left and just fix things (immigration, breakdown of the family, etc, etc.....) without any regard for what the left thinks. They tried to call Trump a dictator and basicly they installed one instead. They ALWAYS do themselves what they accuse our side of doing. Then they expect our side to always follow decorum and take the high road while they advance their anti-American policies and culture.
We need a leader who will say "nahh, we aren't doing that anymore" and then the left will either have to crawl back under their rocks OR choose to resist and become the American Taliban insurgency themselves (which they've already done all summer last year). Either way, our side wins...this way, our side doesn't become physically offensive and just fixes things like Han Solo when the Millennium Falcon came under attack by the Empire and Princess Leah was busy yapping her trap and he told her "We don't have time to run this by a committee, Luke, we've got company"!
Trump rolled over so he could go back to his cushy life at Mari Lago and left the peasants to deal with the barbarians. MLK, Washington, Mandela, Jefferson, Ghandi, etc...these men were willing to die or go to prison for their cause and their people. That is the ONLY way we can win is if we have a leader like that. Also, I'm not suggesting I am any better...this is just my opinion but people like this do not just grow on trees.
We may need a leader who has to ignore the rule of law to save the rule of law (I don't like it but that's basically where we are now). The commies use the law to destroy the law...our side needs to figure that out very quickly. After Washington was done, he rejected becoming king...therefore, this CAN be done without this hypothetical leader becoming an actual dictator, and also without our side initiating any physical offensiveness. That would be the worst thing that could happen because we lose the moral high ground. Let the left become the insurgents instead and just fix America. People would turn on them pretty fast if they turned our major cities into Baghdad.
We need a leader who will say "nahh, we aren't doing that anymore" and then the left will either have to crawl back under their rocks OR choose to resist and become the American Taliban insurgency themselves (which they've already done all summer last year). Either way, our side wins...this way, our side doesn't become physically offensive and just fixes things like Han Solo when the Millennium Falcon came under attack by the Empire and Princess Leah was busy yapping her trap and he told her "We don't have time to run this by a committee, Luke, we've got company"!
Trump rolled over so he could go back to his cushy life at Mari Lago and left the peasants to deal with the barbarians. MLK, Washington, Mandela, Jefferson, Ghandi, etc...these men were willing to die or go to prison for their cause and their people. That is the ONLY way we can win is if we have a leader like that. Also, I'm not suggesting I am any better...this is just my opinion but people like this do not just grow on trees.
We may need a leader who has to ignore the rule of law to save the rule of law (I don't like it but that's basically where we are now). The commies use the law to destroy the law...our side needs to figure that out very quickly. After Washington was done, he rejected becoming king...therefore, this CAN be done without this hypothetical leader becoming an actual dictator, and also without our side initiating any physical offensiveness. That would be the worst thing that could happen because we lose the moral high ground. Let the left become the insurgents instead and just fix America. People would turn on them pretty fast if they turned our major cities into Baghdad.
Last edited: