These two statements are not analogous. In the former , any reasonable person would respond by trying to flee the perceived threat. In the latter, No reasonable person would kill or maim in response to a clearly non life threatening event.
hmm, in the former you are somewhat correct, in the latter i am clearly asking a open ended question, not a statement.
If you would rather split hairs and discuss analogous statements and what is a reasonable analogy and what a reasonable culture is or how reasonable people will or will not act, in responce to a subjectivly clear non or life threating act or action, then start a thread and ill debate you.