Sarcasm, ok everyone except me.
ha!!!
Sarcasm, ok everyone except me.
It's his money. I suppose he is free to use it however he likes. Discrimination? Really? Can you just look at a gay person and tell they are gay? If a person declares they are gay, is that enough to attain protected status?
This entire line of non reasoning is amazingly illogical. I understand, to an extent, anti-discrimination laws on conditions that are beyond the control of people, but sexual proclivities are a choice. This illogic ends in everyone attaining protected demographic status, and in the worst cases you can imagine.
When you utter nonsense about logic and reasoning and claim "sexual proclivities" are a choice, expect to get challanged.
The argument in question here is whether two parties can marry, regardless of their gender and orientation. This is not asking for protection, it's asking for equality.
Do you advocate any limitations? The .gov should be totally removed from any regulation of marriage.
I'm not a puss, I'll say it.
Marriage is between a man and a women.
Anybody else is on their own.
Your words sting me. I am terrified, assuming you meant "challenged". BTW, a strong inclination can, and possibly should, be controlled.
I'm not a puss, I'll say it.
Marriage is between a man and a women.
Anybody else is on their own.
LOL I bet if you would just show him how much more success you are he would probably listen ( by the way he is prob too busy with his failed attempt at life to be on the internet flapping his gums about something he knows nothing about you should prob write him a letter)In my opinion:
1 - Chikfila makes the most disgusting sandwich ever. It's essentially a frozen patty from walmart, about as bland as you can get.
2 - Who cares what anybody in the food service industry thinks about anything political. You wound up in the food service industry because you failed at life, why would I be concerned with any of your opinions?
Enter your email address to join: