Tip of the day: Take non-horrific hunting pictures

[RidgeHunter]

I'll take pics of my deer where ever i damn well please ,thank you very much

Oh, you're welcome.

Wondered how long that would take. Always gotta be one.

It was a friendly tip and something I wish I would have done years ago ( I took few pictures and the ones I took were crappy). If something as simple as a friendly tip on an internet forum offends you, the problem lies with you, not me.

Thanks for playing.

 

[264Magnum]

Funny thing is, I always take a couple pics with extra gore in them just so my liberal, hippie, PETA aunt can have something to look at.

 

[saddlebum]

Oh, you're welcome.

Wondered how long that would take. Always gotta be one.

It was a friendly tip and something I wish I would have done years ago ( I took few pictures and the ones I took were crappy). If something as simple as a friendly tip on an internet forum offends you, the problem lies with you, not me.

Thanks for playing.

it was supposed to be a joke, guess you had to be here

 

[RidgeHunter]

Funny thing is, I always take a couple pics with extra gore in them just so my liberal, hippie, PETA aunt can have something to look at.

That's a valid reason. Might as well antagonize the anoying self-righteous ones. It's the non-hunters that don't think they walk on water and don't put me down for hunting I try not to gross out/offend. (I'm surprised how many non-hunters want to see pictures of my dead critters, but they always do.) Plus, I like good pictures myself.

it was supposed to be a joke, guess you had to be here

Damn me, my sarcasm meter was overruled by the fact I knew there would really be someone waiting to ***** about this thread when I typed it. Woops.

If they are out there, read what I wrote to saddlebum and apply it to your dumbass...and don't post your crap.

To saddlebum,

 

[dennishoddy]

Funny thing is, I always take a couple pics with extra gore in them just so my liberal, hippie, PETA aunt can have something to look at.

Good God, I had one of those.
That Biatch trashed me in front of all of the relatives on the going away party my parents put on when leaving for SE Asia in 1970.

I think she was dissapointed when coming back alive.

During family reunions, etc, she would always make a point of mentioning how much a a killer I was since I hunted and served.
She would send letters, and so on....It got to be a joke.
In her demented mind the entire war was my fault....

When she died a few years ago the family was totally impressed that I wanted to be a pall bearer....Did my duty.

What they didn't know was my inner feelings.

All I wanted to do was be a part of putting that Biatch into the ground.

I wanted a hands-on.

I've posted this before, but, ...................everytime I hear of somebody else like 264magnum getting the same.........

Carry on....sorry about hijacking the thread for a moment.

 

[Glock 'em down]

Forget pics...video is by far the best!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biAfNz2lLAc&feature=related

 

[RidgeHunter]

Provoking douchebags is always the exception to every rule. By all means, make a murder scene picture just for those people.

I real life troll narrow minded people all the time, it's a blast. If someone douchey wanna be liberal sees me as a super conservative right wing nutjub, I'll play that up just to screw with them, even though I'm not even all that political and have libertarian/socially liberal views.

If they aren't going to see any other viewpoints, why not get them going? The heck with ignorant people, use them for your own amusement. It's their only redeeming value.

I get my material for that real life trolling from OSA General Discussions.

 

[300WSM]

Happiness is a steamin gutpile.

 

[dennishoddy]

QUOTE=RidgeHunter;1321218]Provoking douchebags is always the exception to every rule. By all means, make a murder scene picture just for those people.

I real life troll narrow minded people all the time, it's a blast. If someone douchey wanna be liberal sees me as a super conservative right wing nutjub, I'll play that up just to screw with them, even though I'm not even all that political and have libertarian/socially liberal views.

If they aren't going to see any other viewpoints, why not get them going? The heck with ignorant people, use them for your own amusement. It's their only redeeming value.

I get my material for that real life trolling from OSA General Discussions.[/QUOTE]




There are some easy triggers to trip there


Good Lord, we are on the same page......

 

[Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow]

Hmmm, I dunno - you'll have to explain to me why we want to eliminate signs of violence in hunting..... when seems to me that doing so helps to feed into and perpetuate the very idea that anti-hunters and fence-sitters buy into - the idea that there is NO VIOLENCE in obtaining meat - deer just die instantly and fall in the woods with no blood when you shoot them -- just like the meat that shows up in their grocer's freezer and display likewise came from cows and other animals that just wandered out of the free-range woods, walked up to the slaughterhouse, and offered themselves by instantly dying of diseaseless natural causes on their 3rd birthday with no blood (that IS what happens with grocery-store meat, right?)

Why are we trying to deceive, when it just reinforces the idea that meat eating is violent-less (which in turn feeds into the stupid anti-hunting mindset)? Deer tongues hang out - that's just what they do. Seems to me that making the city folks understand that all meat-getting is violent, including that which they eat, by showing the reality of hunting (which in turn will make them more accepting and supportive of hunting, or at least agnostic on it) is more likely to be accomplished, than some sort of deception that either: (a) no meat getting is violent - not likely to be accomplished seems to me, when the anti-hunting types are out there screaming in their ears about how horrible hunting is, leading to the belief that hunting is violent, but THEIR meat in THEIR grocer's freeze is not violent, or (b) actually trying to convince them that hunting is somehow LESS violent than slaughterhouses. Certainly hunting is LESS CRUEL over the life of the animal, as the hunted animal is free range until its death, whereas the slaughterhouse meat animal is captive it's entire life, but at the moment of slaughter / harvest, neither one is really more or less violent than the other - in that they're both quite violent - the skull-air-gun vs. hunter's gun - yet neither are unduly violent, if talking about the majority / ethical hunter. I dunno.

Only deception I engage in is to pull the corn chunks off their lips and color over the tan spots with a brown magic marker. Maybe saw off the antlers if it's a doe-only hunt. I kid, I kid.

Happiness is a steamin gutpile.

This.....