Zimmerman

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.

twoguns?

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 29, 2009
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
28
Location
LTown to the Lst
If Zimmerman is acquited, he may still be within the age range to join the French Foreign Legion. They will give him a new name and country of origin.

[Broken External Image]

Being a Legionaire would pose a linguistic challenge for Zimmerman. I don't know that Zimmerman can even speak Spanish. But as the Foreign Legion information brochure goes on to say, "Previous knowledge of the French language is not necessary, it will be acquired.".

They claim he was Latino...probably spoke fluent Latin, I guess?
 

n2sooners

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
1,571
Reaction score
0
Location
Moore
Just because you don't agree with someone or don't understand doesn't mean it doesn't make sense.

You know what doesn't make sense? Blood flowing uphill around the neck of someone lying on their back.

You know what doesn't make any sense? Blood flowing anywhere on someone who is laying on their back. Most likely the blood he bled while having his pounded into the ground ended up on the pavement or grass. The blood flow in those pictures is consistent with someone standing up or sitting and looking down. Which doesn't contradict Zimmerman getting up after firing the shot and looking down at Martin on the ground or looking down while riding in the car.
 

Hobbes

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
8,737
Reaction score
749
Location
The Nations
You know what doesn't make any sense? Blood flowing anywhere on someone who is laying on their back. Most likely the blood he bled while having his pounded into the ground ended up on the pavement or grass. The blood flow in those pictures is consistent with someone standing up or sitting and looking down. Which doesn't contradict Zimmerman getting up after firing the shot and looking down at Martin on the ground or looking down while riding in the car.
Either that OR a GZ that was losing a fight and couldn't draw his weapon because he was on his back and the pistol was pinned beneath him.
Rolling over in the struggle GZ found himself on top and now with the ability to draw his weapon on a screaming TM.

What evidence is there to distinguish between these two theories?
None, except for the story told by the defendant charged with murder.
 

Fredkrueger100

Dream Master
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
7,870
Reaction score
6,179
Location
Shawnee, OK
Are going to believe the defense lawyers or you own lying eyes?
That is the question.
Well I have seen all the evidence and heard the testimony. There is no way on God's green earth that Zimmerman is guilty. And for someone to believe that is just amazing. I do know Florida law and Zimmerman was well within his right to use deadly force. Should he have followed Martin after being told no, probably not. But lets think about something for a minute. Just the other night my mother in law called and said that her door was opened. It has one deadbolt that has to be locked for the door to stay shut. Someone opened the door. Either by force or with a key. I grabbed my pistol and headed over. She was on the phone with the police when I arrived. They told us to stay there until they arrived. Well my little nephew was in the car so I wasn't about to wait for them slow ass cops to arrive. We could have been dead by then. So I disobeyed and went in. Turns out that no one was in there. It was my sister in laws loser husband that came over and went through my mother in laws pills. He was so high he didn't shut the door when he left. The point is that sometimes there is a good reason to not listen to the cops or in that case a dispatcher. They aren't there to see what is going on. What if Zimmerman had let him go and he found someone else and ended up killing them? We would have a completely different scenario to be talking about then. The fact is that we weren't there and we aren't George Zimmerman so we can't say what he should have done. But the evidence is not favoring a conviction. Rather, an acquittal. And the only reason he is even going through this trial right now is because of all the blacks and our loser president.
 

n2sooners

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
1,571
Reaction score
0
Location
Moore
Either that OR a GZ that was losing a fight and couldn't draw his weapon because he was on his back and the pistol was pinned beneath him.
Rolling over in the struggle GZ found himself on top and now with the ability to draw his weapon on a screaming TM.

What evidence is there to distinguish between these two theories?
None, except for the story told by the defendant charged with murder.

I can make up stories too, still doesn't make it evidence. The defense medical expert (and the only competent medical expert to testify) said Martin was on top when he was shot. Maybe he is wrong, but he has more expertise and information on the case than either of us do. All we can do is make up plausible stories, but as long as one of those reasonable stories finds Zimmerman acted in self defense then he can't be convicted beyond a reasonable doubt.
 

loudshirt

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
1,312
Reaction score
32
Location
Tulsa
Either that OR a GZ that was losing a fight and couldn't draw his weapon because he was on his back and the pistol was pinned beneath him.
Rolling over in the struggle GZ found himself on top and now with the ability to draw his weapon on a screaming TM.

What evidence is there to distinguish between these two theories?
None, except for the story told by the defendant charged with murder.

Oh and expert medical testimony about how the gun shot wound showed the Martin was leaning forward with his hoodie hanging off his body at the time of the gunshot.
 

Hobbes

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
8,737
Reaction score
749
Location
The Nations
All I'm saying is we don't KNOW what happened.
All we have is the stories the defendant are telling and those aren't facts so don't argue them as facts.
They are one side of the story and nothing more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top Bottom